Individual versus social complexity, with particular reference to ant colonies

Abstract

Insect societies colonies of ants, bees, wasps and termites--vary enormously in their social complexity. Social complexity is a broadly used term that encompasses many individual and colony-level traits and characteristics such as colony size, polymorphism and foraging strategy. A number of earlier studies have considered the relationships among various correlates of social complexity in insect societies; in this review, we build upon those studies by proposing additional correlates and show how all correlates can be integrated in a common explanatory framework. The various correlates are divided among four broad categories (sections). Under 'polyphenism' we consider the differences among individuals, in particular focusing upon 'caste' and specialization of individuals. This is followed by a section on 'totipotency' in which we consider the autonomy and subjugation of individuals. Under this heading we consider various aspects such as intracolony conflict, worker reproductive potential and physiological or morphological restrictions which limit individuals' capacities to perform a range of tasks or functions. A section entitled 'organization of work' considers a variety of aspects, e.g. the ability to tackle group, team or partitioned tasks, foraging strategies and colony reliability and efficiency. A final section, 'communication and functional integration', considers how individual activity is coordinated to produce an integrated and adaptive colony. Within each section we use illustrative examples drawn from the social insect literature (mostly from ants, for which there is the best data) to illustrate concepts or trends and make a number of predictions concerning how a particular trait is expected to correlate with other aspects of social complexity. Within each section we also expand the scope of the arguments to consider these relationships in a much broader sense of'sociality' by drawing parallels with other 'social' entities such as multicellular individuals, which can be understood as 'societies' of cells. The aim is to draw out any parallels and common causal relationships among the correlates. Two themes run through the study. The first is the role of colony size as an important factor affecting social complexity. The second is the complexity of individual workers in relation to the complexity of the colony. Consequently, this is an ideal opportunity to test a previously proposed hypothesis that 'individuals of highly social ant species are less complex than individuals from simple ant species' in light of numerous social correlates. Our findings support this hypothesis. In summary, we conclude that, in general, complex societies are characterized by large colony size, worker polymorphism, strong behavioural specialization and loss of totipotency in its workers, low individual complexity, decentralized colony control and high system redundancy, low individual competence, a high degree of worker cooperation wher tackling tasks, group foraging strategies, high tempo, multi-chambered tailor-made nests, h...

Extraordinary starvation resistance in Temnothorax rugatulus (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) colonies: Demography and adaptive behavior

“…4b). This contrasts with the predictions of theoretical models of the cyclic ant nest activity (Hemerik et al, 1990) and may only be explained on the basis of increased task efficiency with more workers (Anderson and McShea, 2001): Tasks may get done faster, shortening the activity cycles and increasing the individual thresholds to become active (Hemerik et al, 1990), especially under starvation conditions. Both, individual worker and queen trophallaxis rates increased over the experimental period but no significant effect of the time was found independent of the demographic variables.…”

The emergence of a superorganism through intergroup competition

“…In other words, species that typically inhabit richer patches will typically have larger colonies and also greater cooperation, as is observed. Greater cooperation in large colonies may also be reflected by the enhanced work tempo of workers in larger colonies (15,16,28), on the assumption that worker inactivity reflects enhanced selfishness (e.g., unwillingness to assume the costs of foraging chores).…”

Specialization and group size: brain and behavioural correlates of colony size in ants lacking morphological castes

“…Group size is positively correlated with the degree of reproductive and non-reproductive division of labour in multicellular organisms (e.g. volvocine algae [3] and ants [4,5]). Individuals in a group can specialize on a set of tasks required for the efficient functioning of the group, leading to division of labour.…”

“…Individuals in a group can specialize on a set of tasks required for the efficient functioning of the group, leading to division of labour. Morphological differentiation can occur among ant castes, but most eusocial societies show division of labour with little morphological differentiation among individuals [5,6]. In ant species with morphologically similar workers (monomorphic ants), colony organization depends on task partitioning that emerges from body-size-independent behavioural specializations of the individuals [6].…”