2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual effects of different selenocompounds on the hepatic proteome and energy metabolism of mice

Abstract: Thus, it is important to consider Se compound-specific effects when supplementing with selenium.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, a significantly downregulation of GSTm1 and GSTp1 transcript and protein levels as well as GST enzyme activities were detected in liver tissues of the same mouse strain in response to Se supplementation when compared to the corresponding Se-deficient group [23], which was also demonstrated in rat liver tissues by Blum and coworkers [44]. Moreover, the mRNA level and enzyme activity of the Nrf2 target NAD(P)H dehydrogenase [quinone] 1 (NQO1) was significantly downregulated in the Se-supplemented groups when compared to the -Se group in liver [23]. However, these findings could not be observed in the colon (data not shown) indicating that there might be differences in the general redox-capacity between murine liver and colon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, a significantly downregulation of GSTm1 and GSTp1 transcript and protein levels as well as GST enzyme activities were detected in liver tissues of the same mouse strain in response to Se supplementation when compared to the corresponding Se-deficient group [23], which was also demonstrated in rat liver tissues by Blum and coworkers [44]. Moreover, the mRNA level and enzyme activity of the Nrf2 target NAD(P)H dehydrogenase [quinone] 1 (NQO1) was significantly downregulated in the Se-supplemented groups when compared to the -Se group in liver [23]. However, these findings could not be observed in the colon (data not shown) indicating that there might be differences in the general redox-capacity between murine liver and colon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each group eight animals were randomly assigned. The groups were fed with diets supplemented with either adequate (ad; 150 μg Se/kg diet) or supra‐nutritive (high, hi; 750 μg Se/kg diet) Se concentrations in form of selenite, selenate, and SeMet, respectively, whereas the control group received a Se‐deficient diet (–Se) as previously described .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It suggested the Se from SeNPs-CM is apt to be stored in the liver. Additionally, Se accumulation in the liver was found in mice or fish when BSA-SeNPs 34,44,45 or selenite 34 or selenate 46 were given. Possibly, inorganic Se was inclined to be collected in hepatic tissue.…”
Section: Selenium Retention In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the significance of the applied Se species has been recognized as a key factor in health outcomes (reviewed in), only few studies have addressed species‐specific effects in vivo (e.g., refs. ). Therefore, the current study aimed for a comparative analysis of three different Se species including selenite, SeMet, and MeSeCys in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans ( C. elegans ), examining their respective bioavailability, incorporation into proteins, protective role against oxidative stress, and impact on the antioxidative system, namely, TXNRD activity as well as the Nrf2/Skn‐1 and FoxO/Daf‐16 pathways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%