Individual differences in the temporal progression of motion sickness and anxiety: the role of passengers’ trait anxiety and motion sickness history

Stelling, Dirk; Hermes, Michael; Huelmann, Gerrit; Mittelstädt, Justin; Niedermeier, Dominik; Schudlik, Kevin; Duda, Holger

doi:10.1080/00140139.2021.1886334

Cited by 8 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There is limited research on the relationship between personality traits and cybersickness, an extended reality (XR) health indicator. A recent study found no correlations between but other findings link greater anxiety, a facet of neuroticism, to more severe cybersickness symptoms (Stelling et al, 2021). Further, anxiety has been found to mediate the relationship between VR setting and nausea and disorientation (Pot-Kolder et al, 2018).…”

Section: Individual Differences In Cybersicknessmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…Motion sickness susceptibility has been correlated with neuroticism (Reason & Brand, 1975;Shupak & Gordon, 2006), introversion (Shupak & Gordon, 2006), and anxiety (Owen et al, 1998). Additionally, personality-related factors including traitanxiety, locus of control, and repression-sensitization can have a significant impact on the susceptibility of motion sickness (Keinan et al, 1981;Stelling et al, 2021). However, other research has shown that there are no significant correlations between the Big-Five personality inventory and motion sickness susceptibility (Golding, 2006;Nieto & Golding, 2006).…”

Section: Individual Differences In Motion Sicknessmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Relationship Between Personality, Recalled Cybersickness Severity, and Recalled Cybersickness Recovery Time

Jasper

Doty

Sepich

et al. 2021

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Characteristics of a virtual reality user are known to affect cybersickness, but the specific role of individual differences, such as personality, is largely unknown. This study addressed this gap through examination of subjective recall survey data relating to experiences in virtual reality, including severity of cybersickness symptoms, cybersickness recovery time, and personality. Mediational structural equation modeling on data from 203 participants who used virtual reality at least once per month indicated that extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness were associated with cybersickness severity and that severity was associated with cybersickness recovery time. Further, cybersickness severity fully mediated the relationship between personality and recovery time. These findings highlight the potential relationship between individual differences in personality and suggest further investigation into cybersickness with experimental data and validated measures.

show abstract

Section: Individual Differences In Cybersicknessmentioning

confidence: 96%

Section: Individual Differences In Motion Sicknessmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Relationship Between Personality, Recalled Cybersickness Severity, and Recalled Cybersickness Recovery Time

Jasper

Doty

Sepich

et al. 2021

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A study by Wurthmann et al [36] exposed patients with vestibular migraine and healthy controls to a rotary chair test and found that those with vestibular migraine reported more severe motion sickness and recovered slower from these symptoms than healthy participants. Further, trait anxiety has been shown to alter the course of motion sickness during a flight simulator study [37], whereas other personality factors, such as neuroticism, have not been identified as relevant factors for motion sickness/VIMS susceptibility [31]. Similarly, trait anxiety/neuroticsm failed as a significant predictor for motion sickness/VIMS in another study [35]…”

Section: Other Individual Risk Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Motion sickness: current concepts and management

Keshavarz

Golding

2021

Current Opinion in Neurology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of reviewMotion sickness is an ancient phenomenon that affects many people. Nausea, vomiting, disorientation, sweating, fatigue, and headache are just few of the many signs and symptoms that are commonly experienced during an episode of motion sickness. In the present review, we will provide an overview of the current research trends and topics in the domain of motion sickness, including theoretical considerations, physiological and neural mechanisms, individual risk factors, and treatment options, as well as recommendations for future research directions. Recent findingsMore recently, motion sickness has been in the focus of attention in the context of two global technological trends, namely automated vehicles and virtual reality. Both technologies bear the potential to revolutionize our daily lives in many ways; however, motion sickness is considered a serious concern that threatens their success and acceptance. The majority of recent research on motion sickness focuses on one of these two areas.

show abstract

“…This constitutes a bad experience for the driver and can lead to them having a negative preconception of driving simulators in general. If the person agrees to participate in further driving simulator experiments, this tainted image can produce anxiety and pre-discomfort (Liebherr et al, 2021), which have been demonstrated to be negatively linked to SS (Bertin et al, 2004;Stelling et al, 2021). This negative preconception can also lead to definitive refusal of further participation in such experiments.…”

Section: Architecture / Model Mismatch and Simulator Sickness: Our Hypothesismentioning

confidence: 99%

Motorcycle Riding Simulator Controllability and Simulator Sickness: A Proof-of-Concept System

Michel

Éspié

Bouaziz

2021

Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Driving a motorcycle relies on the feedback provided by several human sensory systems, on the one hand, and anticipation of the consequences of control actions, on the other hand. Driving simulators aim to create the illusion of driving by stimulating the driver's sensory systems. However, a significant number of drivers experience simulator sickness, which hinders the usefulness of driving simulators in their applications, such as driving behavior research or training / re-training. Simulator sickness occurrence is often attributed to sensory conflict. In this work, we propose an approach to understanding simulator sickness by considering the need for coherence between the complexity of the vehicle model and the complexity of the simulator from a hardware point-of-view, which constrains the fidelity of the reproduced sensory stimuli. We then describe the design of a proof-of-concept system that considers the particular issue of haptic feedback for the handlebars of a motorcycle-riding simulator. We will use this system in further experiments to demonstrate the impact of the coherence or mismatch of those two aspects on controllability and simulator sickness occurrence.

show abstract

Individual differences in the temporal progression of motion sickness and anxiety: the role of passengers’ trait anxiety and motion sickness history

Cited by 8 publications

References 47 publications

The Relationship Between Personality, Recalled Cybersickness Severity, and Recalled Cybersickness Recovery Time

The Relationship Between Personality, Recalled Cybersickness Severity, and Recalled Cybersickness Recovery Time

Motion sickness: current concepts and management

Motorcycle Riding Simulator Controllability and Simulator Sickness: A Proof-of-Concept System

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About