2001
DOI: 10.1007/s002130100805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual differences in sucrose consumption in the rat: motivational and neurochemical correlates of hedonia

Abstract: These results support the contention that motivational differences may partially account for individual variability in sucrose consumption, and that dopaminergic and/or opioidergic agents differentially affect the "wanting" and/or "liking" of sucrose in the High and Low sucrose consumers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
43
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
5
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are an indirect assessment of loss of interest or of pleasure for daily activities in the treated animals. Although it is hard to extrapolate these results to clinical depression, we must recognize that anhedonia 32 as evaluated in this kind of models, could be associated with a depressive like behavior. The same could be said for the loss of interest in feeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are an indirect assessment of loss of interest or of pleasure for daily activities in the treated animals. Although it is hard to extrapolate these results to clinical depression, we must recognize that anhedonia 32 as evaluated in this kind of models, could be associated with a depressive like behavior. The same could be said for the loss of interest in feeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tests were performed in a randomized sequence. Animals were exposed to the elevated plus-maze test of anxiety; 43,44 the Morris water maze to assess spatial learning and memory; 45,46 the sucrose consumption test to evaluate depression-induced anhedonia, 32,47 and the Porsolt forced swim test to evaluate anxiety and depression. 48 …”
Section: Behavioral Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to comparing commodities, BPs have been shown to vary systematically as a function of the stimulus qualities of the commodity or magnitude of the commodity. In general, increasing the amount of commodity delivered per reinforcement increases the BP for that commodity (e.g., Dantzer 1976;Hodos 1961;Hodos and Kalman 1963;Sclafani and Ackroff 2003;Reilly 1999), but Brennan et al (2001) reported an inverted-U function with BP increasing and then decreasing at the highest concentration of a sucrose solution. Given the greater BP for highly palatable food (candy) in monkeys and the role that such food plays in the development of obesity (e.g., Blundell and Finlayson 2004) it was of interest to develop procedures for measuring satiation on both palatable and standard food intake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While operant procedures that measure changes in response rate alone cannot separate changes in reward strength from alterations in performance capacity, the breakpoint derived from the PR schedule is a well-validated measure of the rewarding effects of food. The PR task has been used extensively to assess the rewarding impact of drugs of abuse and food in rats (e.g., [6][7][8] ), but to a lesser extent in mice 9 . The increased use of genetically engineered mice and diet-induced obese mouse models has heightened demands for behavioral measures of food reward in mice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%