2023
DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1068609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual differences in social homeostasis

Abstract: The concept of “social homeostasis”, introduced by Matthews and Tye in 2019, has provided a framework with which to consider our changing individual needs for social interaction, and the neurobiology underlying this system. This model was conceived as including detector systems, a control center with a setpoint, and effectors which allow us to seek out or avoid additional social contact. In this article, we review and theorize about the many different factors that might contribute to the setpoint of a person o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 160 publications
(172 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like all regulatory functions, these are defined by temporal interdependencies: how the system changes between time x and time x + t is contingent on the state of the system at time x (Bergson, 2007; Cole, Lougheed, Chow, & Ram, 2020; Lunkenheimer, Hamby, Lobo, Cole, & Olson, 2020). But the crucial point of difference for coregulation is that it is also relational in essence: the change in partner 1 is contingent not just on the previous state of partner 1, but also on the state of partner 2 (Bales et al., 2023; Fogel, 1993; Schneirla, 1946). In this way, coregulation is like a dance—or a series of intricate, interleaved dances across different levels and different systems, each essential for keeping us alive (Feldman, 2007; Kopp, 1982; Munakata, Snyder, & Chatham, 2012; Nigg, 2017; Tronick, 1982; Zhang, Gatzke‐Kopp, Cole, & Ram, 2022).…”
Section: Why Study Interactions?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like all regulatory functions, these are defined by temporal interdependencies: how the system changes between time x and time x + t is contingent on the state of the system at time x (Bergson, 2007; Cole, Lougheed, Chow, & Ram, 2020; Lunkenheimer, Hamby, Lobo, Cole, & Olson, 2020). But the crucial point of difference for coregulation is that it is also relational in essence: the change in partner 1 is contingent not just on the previous state of partner 1, but also on the state of partner 2 (Bales et al., 2023; Fogel, 1993; Schneirla, 1946). In this way, coregulation is like a dance—or a series of intricate, interleaved dances across different levels and different systems, each essential for keeping us alive (Feldman, 2007; Kopp, 1982; Munakata, Snyder, & Chatham, 2012; Nigg, 2017; Tronick, 1982; Zhang, Gatzke‐Kopp, Cole, & Ram, 2022).…”
Section: Why Study Interactions?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…63 If our High OT treatment also activated the AVP system, females may have experienced a heightened HPA-axis activation, and this potential perception of elevated stress might disrupt typical social bonding behaviors. 64 For example, the "tend-and-befriend" theory suggests females may be particularly likely to initiate social interactions when experiencing stress. 65 We similarly observed females spending less time near their parents when treated with OTA.…”
Section: Juvenile Separation Distressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like any dance, they defined by temporal interdependencies: how the system changes between timex and timex+t is contingent on the state of the system at timex (Bergson, 2007;Cole et al, 2020). And they are relational in essence: the change in partner 1 is contingent not just on the previous state of partner 1, but also on state of partner 2 (Bales et al, 2023;Fogel, 1993;Schneirla, 1946). It is this dance which drives infants' attentional and cognitive development, as it progressively elaborates and unfurls, encompassing levels of explanation that become greater, more varied, and epistemologically more complex over time.…”
Section: Applications Future Directions and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%