2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00376-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual differences in mismatch negativity measures of involuntary attention shift

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Namely, high-HA and high-NS subjects showed larger MMN than low-HA subjects and low-NS subjects, respectively. Several studies previously reported relationships between MMN amplitude and personality dimensions such as HA (Hansenne et al, 2003), neuroticism (Wang, Zhu, Pan, Hu, & Wang, 2001), impulsivity (Franken, Nijs, & VanStrier, 2005), or extraversion (Sasaki, Campbell, Gordon Bazana, & Stelmack, 2000). The reason why both BIS- and BAS-related dimensions were occasionally reported to be related to MMN amplitude has still to be clarified, but these results suggest that, asides from emotional differences, personality may influence information cognitive processing, giving support to the notion of personality-related attentional styles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, high-HA and high-NS subjects showed larger MMN than low-HA subjects and low-NS subjects, respectively. Several studies previously reported relationships between MMN amplitude and personality dimensions such as HA (Hansenne et al, 2003), neuroticism (Wang, Zhu, Pan, Hu, & Wang, 2001), impulsivity (Franken, Nijs, & VanStrier, 2005), or extraversion (Sasaki, Campbell, Gordon Bazana, & Stelmack, 2000). The reason why both BIS- and BAS-related dimensions were occasionally reported to be related to MMN amplitude has still to be clarified, but these results suggest that, asides from emotional differences, personality may influence information cognitive processing, giving support to the notion of personality-related attentional styles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MMN responses were derived by the traditional approach where the averaged ERP waveforms of the standards were subtracted from that recorded for the deviants in each of the two oddball runs (i.e., runs "a" and "b" in Figure 1). We employed this approach to extract the MMN because of its popularity with assessing both normal and clinical populations (e.g., Groenen et al 1996;Sasaki et al 2000;Sabri & Campbell, 2001;Näätänen et al 2004). Furthermore, earlier research from our group (Walker et al 2001) lead us to believe that, under comparable test conditions (i.e., same stimulus deviance, ISI, and recording parameters), the MMNs elicited from other extraction techniques are not significantly different.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However with a nose reference, typically larger peak amplitudes are recorded for the central electrodes rather than the frontal electrodes (Sasaki et al 2000). Typical latency window for frequency deviants for MMN falls between 50 to 175 ms with ISIs of 0.5 and 1.5 ms (Pekkonen et al 1995).…”
Section: Mmn and Differential Waveform 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies on the pre-attention processing of personality traits relating to SS have indirectly supported the current results. For example, Sasaki, Campbell, Gordon Bazana, and Stelmack (2000) discovered that the amplitude of MMN elicited by changes in frequency in extrovert subjects was larger than that in introvert ones. Franken, Nijs, and Strien (2005) revealed that the scores of self-report impulsivity and the amplitude of MMN elicited by changes in frequency were positively correlated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%