2019
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/j2h8k
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual Differences in Mental Imagery in Different Modalities and Levels of Intentionality

Abstract: Mental imagery is a highly common aspect of everyday cognitive functioning. While substantial progress is being made in clarifying this fundamental human function, much is still unclear or unknown. Examining individual differences in age, sex, and background experience in an activity in relation to the sensory and motor modality and intentionality level of imagery as well as the relation between them will contribute to a more comprehensive account of this mental function. The current online study combined mult… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(124 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Schlagman et al, 2006;2009). However, our findings do agree with reports in the mental imagery literature, which do not typically report associations, or find very small associations, between age and the vividness of various mental imagery stimulus-modalities (Floridou, Peerdeman, & Schaefer, 2019;Lima et al, 2015;Mailouin et al, 2010;Mulder et al, 2007;Saimpont et al, 2012). It has been argued that mental imagery is a fundamental feature of voluntary autobiographical memory and contributes to several of its phenomenological characteristics (Conway, 2009;Greenberg & Knowlton, 2014) such as vividness (D'Argembeau & Van der Linden, 2006).…”
Section: Forms Of Cognitionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…(Schlagman et al, 2006;2009). However, our findings do agree with reports in the mental imagery literature, which do not typically report associations, or find very small associations, between age and the vividness of various mental imagery stimulus-modalities (Floridou, Peerdeman, & Schaefer, 2019;Lima et al, 2015;Mailouin et al, 2010;Mulder et al, 2007;Saimpont et al, 2012). It has been argued that mental imagery is a fundamental feature of voluntary autobiographical memory and contributes to several of its phenomenological characteristics (Conway, 2009;Greenberg & Knowlton, 2014) such as vividness (D'Argembeau & Van der Linden, 2006).…”
Section: Forms Of Cognitionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The scale has subsequently been used in a variety of MI studies, including examinations of INMI accompanied by voluntary and involuntary mental imagery (Floridou et al, 2019b), retrospective versus experience-sampling methods for assessing MI (Cotter & Silvia, 2017), associations between aspects of INMI experience and brain structure (Farrugia et al, 2015), comparisons between INMI as a form of involuntary memory and voluntary MI in terms of tempo recall and emotional response (Jakubowski et al, 2018), and aging and involuntary/voluntary cognitions (Floridou et al, 2019a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%