2005
DOI: 10.1348/135910705x26966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual differences in male body‐image: An examination of self‐objectification in recreational body builders

Abstract: Bodybuilding is associated with outcomes that suggest it may not result in greater overall health for men. It was concluded that objectification theory provides a useful framework for examining body-image differences in men.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
92
0
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
92
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, researchers concerned with the psychology of eating disorders and those exploring hypotheses drawn from the Objectification Theory of Frederickson & Roberts (1997) have assessed feelings of shame specifically in reference to one's body. "Body shame" has been consistently associated with self-objectification and eating disorder symptoms (Hallsworth et al 2005). Andrews (1995Andrews ( , 1998 has examined the link between childhood abuse and body shame (see below).…”
Section: New Directions In Research On Shame and Guiltmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, researchers concerned with the psychology of eating disorders and those exploring hypotheses drawn from the Objectification Theory of Frederickson & Roberts (1997) have assessed feelings of shame specifically in reference to one's body. "Body shame" has been consistently associated with self-objectification and eating disorder symptoms (Hallsworth et al 2005). Andrews (1995Andrews ( , 1998 has examined the link between childhood abuse and body shame (see below).…”
Section: New Directions In Research On Shame and Guiltmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An adapted measure of the EDI-BD was used with male participants, based on adaptations made by Hallsworth, Wade and Tiggemann (2005). These changes included reversing the direction of some items (e.g., "too big/large" changed to "too small"), and making body part references male appropriate by adding items relating to chest and bicep size, and omitting items relating to hip size.…”
Section: Measures Included For the Purpose Of Convergent Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six-items worded in a positive direction were reverse scored and mean item scores were used. The measure has been found to be appropriate for use with the Australian young adult male sample with which it was trialed (Hallsworth et al, 2005) where it had acceptable internal reliability, with a Cronbach's  of 0.83. Internal reliability in the present study was also good for both girls and boys with respective Cronbach's  of 0.90, and 0.81.…”
Section: Measures Included For the Purpose Of Convergent Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normal-weight men are now displaying the desire to be more muscular and bulky, and are dieting to gain muscle in their upper bodies and tone their abdominal muscles (McCreary, Sasse, Saucier, & Dorsch, 2004). Although studies of competitive and recreational bodybuilders (Goldfield, Blouin, & Woodside, 2006;Hallsworth, Wade, & Tiggemann, 2005) and male collegiate athletes (Petrie at al., 2007) suggest that men who desire to increase their muscularity may engage in bulimic behaviors to achieve this goal, no studies of college students have examined whether this relation between the drive for muscularity and bulimic symptomology is common among male non-bodybuilders and non-athletes or among women. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%