2014
DOI: 10.1037/a0033861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual differences in frequency and saliency of speech-accompanying gestures: The role of cognitive abilities and empathy.

Abstract: The present study concerns individual differences in gesture production. We used correlational and multiple regression analyses to examine the relationship between individuals’ cognitive abilities and empathy levels and their gesture frequency and saliency. We chose predictor variables according to experimental evidence of the functions of gesture in speech production and communication. We examined 3 types of gestures: representational gestures, conduit gestures, and palm-revealing gestures. Higher frequency o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
151
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
6
151
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This idea aligns with a number of findings on co-speech gestures (see Pouw et al, 2014 for a review). Speakers who have a lower as opposed to higher visual working-memory capacity are more likely to use gestures when they talk (Chu, Meyer, Foulkes, & Kita, 2013). When speakers are confronted with complex compared to visually distracting information when telling a story they are more likely to gesture (Smithson & Nicoladis, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This idea aligns with a number of findings on co-speech gestures (see Pouw et al, 2014 for a review). Speakers who have a lower as opposed to higher visual working-memory capacity are more likely to use gestures when they talk (Chu, Meyer, Foulkes, & Kita, 2013). When speakers are confronted with complex compared to visually distracting information when telling a story they are more likely to gesture (Smithson & Nicoladis, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual working-memory capacity was measured with an adapted version of the Visual Pattern Test (original VPT; Della Sala, Gray, Baddeley, & Wilson, 1997; adapted VPT; developed and kindly provided to us by Chu et al, 2013). Participants were shown a matrix, in various patterns, wherein half of the cells (i.e., squares of 15 mm × 15 mm) were colored black.…”
Section: Visual Working-memory Capacity: Visual Pattern Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used a similar procedure to control for extreme outliers as used by Chu, Meyer, Foulkes, and Kita (2014). For each independent and dependent variable included in the regression analysis (VPT, TOH3, and TOH4 solving speed and TOH3 and TOH4 number of solving steps), any value laying 3 standard deviations under (or above) the mean will be set to exactly 3SD under (or above) the mean.…”
Section: Outliersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used an adapted version of the VPT (as adapted from and kindly provided by Chu, Meyer, Foulkes, & Kita, 2013). Participants were shown a matrix, in various patterns, wherein half of the cells (i.e., squares of 14 cm × 14 cm) were colored black.…”
Section: Visual Patterns Testmentioning
confidence: 99%