2015
DOI: 10.1002/per.2008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual Differences in Emotional Mimicry: Underlying Traits and Social Consequences

Abstract: Mimicry, the imitation of the nonverbal behaviour of others, serves to establish affiliation and to smoothen social interactions. The present research aimed to disentangle rapid facial reactions (RFRs) to affiliative emotions from RFRs to nonaffiliative emotions from a trait perspective. In line with the Mimicry in Social Context Model by Hess and Fischer, we expected that only the former are mimicry responses indicative of underlying social relating competence and predictive of social satisfaction, whereas th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was also the case in Study 1. Across all participants, the effect for disgust mimicry was only marginally significant; further, the tendency to mimic disgust at all was positively related to neuroticism (Mauersberger et al, ). As such, it may not be surprising that reactions to this expression are not stable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was also the case in Study 1. Across all participants, the effect for disgust mimicry was only marginally significant; further, the tendency to mimic disgust at all was positively related to neuroticism (Mauersberger et al, ). As such, it may not be surprising that reactions to this expression are not stable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the goal of the present research. Specifically, we reanalyzed data from two studies, one measuring emotional mimicry (Mauersberger, Blaison, Kafetsios, Kessler, & Hess, 2015) and one measuring affective reactions to pictorial social stimuli (Dufner et al, 2015), to assess both internal consistency and test-retest reliability for these measures. Before describing these studies in detail, some relevant issues regarding the concept of reliability in this context need to be discussed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examined within the dyad, spouses’ EC can be an indicator of higher SVP. In a recent study, individual differences in emotion mimicry were predictive of higher positive emotion and quality in naturally occurring dyadic interactions in social and personal relationships (Mauersberger, Blaison, Kafetsios, Kessler, & Hess, 2015). The attentional, emotional, and behavioral synchrony that susceptibility to EC promotes can have an even more adaptive function in the context of long-term marital relationships in conjunction with individual ER strategies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suggest that behavioral interaction mechanisms explain friendship influence effects within formed relationships. One such behavioral mechanism connected to personality development is behavioral mimicry (Kurzius & Borkenau, 2015;Lakin & Chartrand, 2003;Mauersberger, Blaison, Kafetsios, Kessler, & Hess, 2015;Salazar Kämpf et al, 2018), referring to the tendency of social partners to imitate each other's behaviors. We suggest that by mimicking interaction partner's sociable behaviors, rather than more reclusive behaviors, dyadic partners increase in extraversion over time.…”
Section: Behavioral Interaction Mechanisms In Network Underlie Influmentioning
confidence: 99%