2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbct.2022.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual differences in depression are reflected in negative self-evaluations when imagining future events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerns about the Self-Referent Encoding Task One important question regarding the SRET and the selfreference effect is its context within cognitive theory. Much as Klein (2012) argues for a "family" of self-reference effects, it is important to note that many variants on the selfreferent encoding task exist, from those measuring selfreference through different questions (e.g., Miskowiak et al, 2018) to those that appear to be an SRET but are focused on other questions than mental health (Williams et al, 2022). (Additionally, a subset of studies which I discuss here refer to a self-referent information processing battery Alloy et al, 1997Alloy et al, , 1999 I argue that the SRET provides a useful measure of both self-schema and memory bias in depression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerns about the Self-Referent Encoding Task One important question regarding the SRET and the selfreference effect is its context within cognitive theory. Much as Klein (2012) argues for a "family" of self-reference effects, it is important to note that many variants on the selfreferent encoding task exist, from those measuring selfreference through different questions (e.g., Miskowiak et al, 2018) to those that appear to be an SRET but are focused on other questions than mental health (Williams et al, 2022). (Additionally, a subset of studies which I discuss here refer to a self-referent information processing battery Alloy et al, 1997Alloy et al, , 1999 I argue that the SRET provides a useful measure of both self-schema and memory bias in depression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying target schemas for individual patients requires an accurate a priori collaborative case conceptualization (Kuyken, Padesky, & Dudley, 2009). In patients with emotional disorders, the maladaptive schema and supporting personal experiences that patients can recall from their lives tend to be frequently simulated and mentally replayed, whereas retrieval of the adaptive schema and associated experiences is rarer and less familiar (Padesky, 1994; for a recent example, see Williams et al, 2022). For example, to access maladaptive self-schemas, clinicians can guide patients to use the downward-arrow technique (e.g., “If this [surface level anxious thought] is true, what does that mean about you?”; see Reimer & Moscovitch, 2015).…”
Section: Applying the Neural Principles Of Schema Change To Optimize ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the extensive literature on autobiographical memory and depression, little is known about how depression impacts people's ability to envision experiences that may occur in their future (Williams et al, 2022). Of the handful of research that has, episodic future thinking has been analysed in terms of reduced specificity, event valence, and subjective ratings of detail/vividness, as opposed to the quantities of episodic and semantic detail (Gamble et al, 2019;Hallford et al, 2019;Hallford et al, 2020;Williams et al, 2022). Hallford et al (2018) conducted the first meta-analysis to review the current research that has investigated whether episodic future thinking is implicated in depression within clinical groups compared to non-clinical control groups.…”
Section: Episodic Future Thinking and Depressionmentioning
confidence: 99%