Individual differences in criterion-based dropout learning in old age: the role of processing speed and verbal knowledge

Abstract

In the present study, individual differences in criterion-based dropout learning in old age were investigated. The predictive role of processing speed and verbal knowledge for individual differences in this type of learning was analyzed. Learning trajectories were modeled using a multilevel approach based on N = 47 older participants (M age = 69.3, SD = 6.4). Participants learned five lists of eight cue-target word pairs across six study-test cycles maximally possible. Results indicate that there were reliable individual differences in the initial level, speed of learning, and quadratic growth of learning. After adjusting for age-related effects, both higher verbal knowledge and higher processing speed had a positive effect on speed of learning. Additionally, verbal knowledge had a negative effect on quadratic growth of learning. Speed of learning and quadratic growth had a positive effect on a delayed recall test after adjusting for effects of processing speed and verbal knowledge. These results emphasize the role of cognitive abilities for individual differences in criterionbased dropout learning in old age.

The effect of strategic memory training in older adults: who benefits most?

“…For processing speed, results reveal that it predicts transfer training gain in the paired associative task. This is in line with studies showing that processing speed is related to associative learning (Kyllonen et al, 1991;Kurtz and Zimprich, 2014). According to the limited time and simultaneity mechanisms proposed by Salthouse (1996), high processing speed may facilitate the encoding of the to-be learned material and the retrieval.…”

Modeling Individual Differences in Autobiographical Memory Distributions Using Mixed Logitnormal Regression

“…To the contrary, it is not the total number of autobiographical memories recalled but rather the distribution of memories across different lifetime periods, which constitutes the major outcome of studies on autobiographical memory (e.g., Conway & Rubin, ; Jansari & Parkin, ; Janssen et al, ). While episodic memory research has benefitted from including individual differences variables, for example, as predictors of performance (e.g., Kurtz & Zimprich, ), the same has not yet happened in autobiographical memory research. However, for a better understanding of psychological phenomena, taking into account individual differences is important (cf.…”

Individual differences in the reminiscence bump of very long-term memory for popular songs in old age: A non-linear mixed model approach

“…Compared to memory research conducted in the laboratory (e.g., Kurtz & Zimprich, 2013; Zimprich, Rast, & Martin, 2008), the examination of very long-term memories offers less experimental control. One reason is that the encoding phase is not part of the experiment, which is why it cannot completely be ensured that, e.g., all participants have heard a specific song before.…”