2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual differences as antecedents of leader behavior: Towards an understanding of multi-level outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 287 publications
1
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, we argue that and test whether followers will respond differently to SLMX and ELMX relationships, depending on their level of other orientation or their “dispositional tendency to be concerned with and helpful to other persons” (Meglino & Korsgaard, , p. 948). Recent reviews of the leadership literature suggest that followers' traits and dispositions are likely to influence the effectiveness of SLMX and ELMX relationships (Tuncdogan, Acar, & Stam, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we argue that and test whether followers will respond differently to SLMX and ELMX relationships, depending on their level of other orientation or their “dispositional tendency to be concerned with and helpful to other persons” (Meglino & Korsgaard, , p. 948). Recent reviews of the leadership literature suggest that followers' traits and dispositions are likely to influence the effectiveness of SLMX and ELMX relationships (Tuncdogan, Acar, & Stam, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, prior research does support our proposed variable ordering. For example, conscientiousness (a generally stable trait) is often viewed as a proximal antecedent of leader behaviors, which in turn drive followers' reactions (DeRue et al, ; Tuncdogan et al, ). A related limitation is that our measures of leader adaptability and satisfaction with the leader were both rated by followers, which introduces common method bias concerns (Podsakoff, Mackenzie, Lee, & Podsakoff, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Hypothesis , we argued that leader adaptability would positively predict followers' shared satisfaction with the leader. Because leader behaviors—including adaptability—are a theoretically more proximal outcome of leader traits than are followers' attitudinal reactions (Antonakis et al, ; DeRue et al, ; Tuncdogan et al, ), we expect that leader adaptability will mediate the interactive effect of leader conscientiousness and leader role authenticity on followers' shared sense of satisfaction with the leader (a conditional indirect effect; Preacher, Rucker, & Hayes, ). Therefore,Hypothesis The indirect effect of leader conscientiousness on followers' shared satisfaction with the leader via leader adaptability is conditional upon leader role authenticity, such that the indirect effect becomes increasingly positive as role authenticity increases and increasingly negative as role authenticity decreases.…”
Section: Theoretical Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations