2009
DOI: 10.1080/13670050802357795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual differences and language interdependence: a study of sequential bilingual development in Spanish–English preschool children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
56
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The notion of a CUP is similar to hypotheses advanced by others. For example, the General Abilities Model (e.g., Castilla, Restrepo, & Perez-Leroux, 2009) posits that the strong relation between skills in L1 and L2 represents an underlying language-learning capacity that children have independent of their intelligence or overall cognitive abilities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion of a CUP is similar to hypotheses advanced by others. For example, the General Abilities Model (e.g., Castilla, Restrepo, & Perez-Leroux, 2009) posits that the strong relation between skills in L1 and L2 represents an underlying language-learning capacity that children have independent of their intelligence or overall cognitive abilities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding suggests that the common underlying proficiencies for code-related skills represent a general language-learning capacity (Castilla et al, 2009) rather than construct-specific abilities. Specific English and Spanish early literacy abilities were generally related to each other within but not across languages (e.g., specific Spanish phonological awareness was related to Spanish expressive vocabulary but not English expressive vocabulary).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example, if language-independent phonological awareness and print knowledge skills represented abilities that were entirely unique to phonological awareness and print knowledge, respectively, those constructs would not be related to each other or to other language-specific aspects of early literacy (e.g., English oral language). However, some researchers have speculated that evidence of cross-language relations of academic skills emerges due to children’s underlying language-learning capacity (Castilla, Restrepo, & Perez-Leroux, 2009). If the common underlying proficiency is indicative of a general language-learning capacity and is not unique to any specific construct, it would be expected that children’s common underlying proficiencies would be related to each other and to language-specific aspects of early literacy across constructs (e.g., common underlying proficiency for print knowledge would be correlated with Spanish-specific aspects of phonological awareness).…”
Section: Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applied to grammatical development, the CUP hypothesis predicts positive transfer of grammatical knowledge between structures with similar surface features in bilinguals. There is also the issue of interdependence between the L1 and the L2 and not necessarily only with structures sharing similar features [57]. Assuming a child has no developmental delays in the first language, that child should relate L1 knowledge and skills to the L2.…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%