2007
DOI: 10.1080/10410230701283405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual Differences and Context: Factors Mediating Recall of Anti-Drug Public Service Announcements

Abstract: A sample of 597 participants was surveyed to examine factors that influence recall of antidrug public service announcements (PSAs). High sensation-seekers and polydrug users recalled somewhat more antidrug PSAs than low sensation-seekers and nonusers. Regression analyses indicated that total hours of television viewing did not predict recall of televised antidrug PSAs; instead, recall was predicted by preference for specific program genres, such as sports, news shows, action programs, sitcoms, and stand-up/com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the results may be relevant to the construction of maximally effective prevention messages. Previous research suggests that substance-related public service announcements may be tailored to enhance exposure and recall for individuals high in sensation seeking (D'Silva & Palmgreen, 2007; Palmgreen, Lorch, Stephenson, Hoyle, & Donohew, 2007). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the results may be relevant to the construction of maximally effective prevention messages. Previous research suggests that substance-related public service announcements may be tailored to enhance exposure and recall for individuals high in sensation seeking (D'Silva & Palmgreen, 2007; Palmgreen, Lorch, Stephenson, Hoyle, & Donohew, 2007). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research states that ads embedded within programs viewed by high sensation seekers (e.g., sports, comedy) stand to garner the biggest bang for their buck (D'Silva & Palmgreen, 2007). Along with airing ads during these genres, future research should consider placing anti-marijuana ads in entertainment programs where audiences are not anticipating such advocacies (Moyer-Gusé, 2008;Slater & Rouner, 2002).…”
Section: Implications For Health Promotionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moderation has already been productively investigated in regard to other determinants of consumer behavior. Potential moderators examined include: consumer desire for uniqueness/unique products (Lynn & Harris, 1997;Ruvio, 2008); sensation seeking/optimal stimulation level (D'Silva & Palmgreen, 2007;Everett & Palmgreen, 1995;Fiore, Jin, & Kim, 2005;Leone & D'Arienzo, 2000;Lorch et al, 1994;Malhotra, 1984;Martin, Sherrard, & Wentzel, 2005); mood (Lee & Sternthal, 1999;Park, Lennon, & Stoel, 2005); need for cognition (Brennan & Bahn, 2006); attitude toward the product category (Arias-Bolzmann, Chakraborty, & Mowen, 2000); prior brand evaluation (Chattopadhyay & Basu, 1990); need to evaluate (Fennis & Bakker, 2001); extraversion/introversion (Chang, 2006a); affect intensity (Moore & Harris, 1996); and self-monitoring (DeBono, 2006). Some individual difference moderators of the effects of humor in advertising have also been identified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%