2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual difference in thermal comfort: A literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
175
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 417 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
9
175
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…44,47 As women's skin temperature increases, their level of thermal discomfort also increases. 48 Other studies report that women's thermal comfort levels were lower than men's, 36,46,47,[49][50][51][52] and these results are similar to those in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…44,47 As women's skin temperature increases, their level of thermal discomfort also increases. 48 Other studies report that women's thermal comfort levels were lower than men's, 36,46,47,[49][50][51][52] and these results are similar to those in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Today, about 70% of U.S. offices are open concept, and they accommodate a significant amount of the working population [20]. Shared offices expose multiple occupants to similar environmental conditions; however, this type of office neglects individual preferences and personal need [21]. For instance, it was found that females are more sensitive to cold exposures than males [22].…”
Section: Human-building Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We see the same trend among the data from China, another widely known collectivist culture. Conversely, 21 Americans were considered to be more environmentally friendly but less willing to discuss control options. This could be due in part because America's individualistic culture makes Americans less likely to discuss building control options with their co-workers.…”
Section: Lift Liftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach, however, is redundant, problematic, time-consuming, and very expensive to deploy in the real world because it would require to collect, label, and train extensive new data for every person in the building. Also, once the models are deployed, there is no guarantee they would work as expected because thermal comfort is affected by unpredictable factors [1], [6].…”
Section: Thermal Comfort Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%