2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12282-017-0785-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual difference in pectoralis major muscle thickness and its effect on single-stage breast reconstruction using a tissue expander

Abstract: These findings demonstrate the usefulness of preoperative measurement of PM thickness in planning of breast reconstruction using a TE. Dissection should be performed more carefully in patients with average PM thickness less than 2.9 mm.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the average PMM thickness ranges approximately 5-25 mm depending on sex, age, race, and medical history. [7][8][9] Furthermore, Koo et al 9 reported an average PMM thickness of 21.4 mm in healthy young White men. Thus, the use of intraoperative ICG-FA of PMM for visualizing blood flow should be suitable in most patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the average PMM thickness ranges approximately 5-25 mm depending on sex, age, race, and medical history. [7][8][9] Furthermore, Koo et al 9 reported an average PMM thickness of 21.4 mm in healthy young White men. Thus, the use of intraoperative ICG-FA of PMM for visualizing blood flow should be suitable in most patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, a complete musculofascial closure can be difficult if the pectoralis major muscle is thin, has poor elasticity, or has a short and medialized insertion, which happens quite frequently in thin patients. 5 In such circumstances, the lateral-lower portion of the expander may be exposed. To solve this old problem, our team has designed a simple solution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%