2017
DOI: 10.1075/jslp.3.2.03nag
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual developmental trajectories in the L2 acquisition of Spanish spirantization

Abstract: In Spanish, voiced stops weaken to approximants and display variables degrees of lenition according to the context in which the stop occurs, making them a complex pronunciation feature. Accumulated findings from cross-sectional research on second language (L2) speakers suggests that many L2 learners struggle to produce the approximants even at the most advanced levels of study. The present study offers a new perspective on the approximants by studying individual learners' production of Spanish [β] over time an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Focusing on Spanish more specifically, a significant body of work has tracked the development of Spanish pronunciation features cross‐sectionally and longitudinally, providing benchmark data on the amount of pronunciation development that can be expected within the context of a communicative language curriculum. Accumulated findings show that classroom language learners’ production of approximant allophones (i.e., [β, ð, ɣ]) in medial contexts (Face & Menke, ; Nagle, ; Shively, ), the tap and trill (Colantoni & Steele, ; Face, ; Major, ; Rose, ), voice onset time in initial stops (Casillas, ; Nagle, ), and some features of Spanish intonation (Zárate–Sández, ) tend to improve with more coursework in L2 Spanish.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on Spanish more specifically, a significant body of work has tracked the development of Spanish pronunciation features cross‐sectionally and longitudinally, providing benchmark data on the amount of pronunciation development that can be expected within the context of a communicative language curriculum. Accumulated findings show that classroom language learners’ production of approximant allophones (i.e., [β, ð, ɣ]) in medial contexts (Face & Menke, ; Nagle, ; Shively, ), the tap and trill (Colantoni & Steele, ; Face, ; Major, ; Rose, ), voice onset time in initial stops (Casillas, ; Nagle, ), and some features of Spanish intonation (Zárate–Sández, ) tend to improve with more coursework in L2 Spanish.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study is part of a larger longitudinal project on L1 English speakers’ perception and production of L2 stops over five data points distributed throughout their second, third, and fourth semesters of college‐level Spanish language instruction (Nagle, , ). With a focus on the perception and production of L2 Spanish stop consonant VOT, this study targeted the temporal characteristics of the perception–production link in instructed L2 acquisition, taking into account three possible configurations: (a) a contemporaneous link, in which perception directly predicts production; (b) delayed models, in which perception predicts production at subsequent data points; and (c) asymptotic models, in which production improves substantially only after perception has reached nativelike accuracy.…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to understanding how linguistic variables map onto L2 speech ratings, longitudinal research on L2 pronunciation development has grown to include studies investigating global characteristics of L2 speech, such as comprehensibility and accentedness (Derwing & Munro, ; Derwing, Munro, & Thomson, ; Saito, ) as well as a range of segmental and phonetic features (Casillas, ; Munro & Derwing, ; Munro et al., ; Nagle, , ). Concentrating on the former, accumulated findings indicate that most pronunciation development occurs within a window of maximal opportunity (Derwing & Munro, ), which corresponds to the first few months of intensive L2 contact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%