2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(99)00094-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual behavioural characteristics in pigs and their impact on production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
28
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given previous findings that an animal's coping profile influences responsiveness to stress (Oortmerssen and Busser 1989;Koolhaas et al 1999;Van Erp-an der Kooij et al 2000;Hawley et al 2010), the goal of the current study was to investigate the impact of EBR training on each of the coping profiles used previously in our laboratory (i.e. passive, active, and variable) to determine whether these predisposed responses to stress can be altered by EBR training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given previous findings that an animal's coping profile influences responsiveness to stress (Oortmerssen and Busser 1989;Koolhaas et al 1999;Van Erp-an der Kooij et al 2000;Hawley et al 2010), the goal of the current study was to investigate the impact of EBR training on each of the coping profiles used previously in our laboratory (i.e. passive, active, and variable) to determine whether these predisposed responses to stress can be altered by EBR training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In bovine, Simmental was more difficult to handle than German Angus (Gauly et al ., 2001). In swine, it was reported that there were positive relations between backtest scores and lean meat percentage that reflect a possibly heritable behavioral trait, which might be influenced by the environment and by the previous experiences (van Erp-van der Kooij et al ., 2000). Additionally, pigs that walked less in the open field pen seemed to have grown faster for a certain period than did pigs with high open field scores (Beilharz et al ., 1967).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased aggression after the mixing of unacquainted animals affects production parameters, as well as animal health and welfare (Sherritt et al, 1974;Tan et al, 1991;Stookey and Gonyou, 1994;van Erp-van der Kooij et al, 2000;Asher et al, 2009;Cañon Jones et al, 2010). With the help of network analysis it becomes possible to determine the development of aggression at three repeated rehousing and mixing events and to characterise the group structure with general network properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%