2021
DOI: 10.26603/001c.18713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual Baseline Balance Assessments in a Large Sample of Incoming NCAA Division I Athletes Using a Force Plate System

Abstract: BACKGROUND BACKGROUNDIndividualized baseline testing is resource and time intensive. The use of normative data to approximate changes after a suspected concussion is thus an appealing alternative. Yet, few peer-reviewed, large-sample studies are available from which to develop accurate normative averages of balance using force-plate technology. PURPOSE PURPOSEThis study sought to validate a normative dataset from the force-plate manufacturer and examine the magnitude and nature of sample variability. STUDY DES… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The balance tasks employed in this study might not be sensitive enough to detect changes in performance in this high functioning young healthy group. The mean scores on all balance outcomes for this sample were toward the higher end of the range of the established age‐matched normative values, (Corwin et al, 2020; Lategan et al, 2023; Weismiller et al, 2021) leading to a potential ceiling effect. For example, the mean LOS sway angle for this study sample before rTMS application was 8.23 ± .77°, whereas the normative age matched value has been reported to be 7.00 to 7.11°.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The balance tasks employed in this study might not be sensitive enough to detect changes in performance in this high functioning young healthy group. The mean scores on all balance outcomes for this sample were toward the higher end of the range of the established age‐matched normative values, (Corwin et al, 2020; Lategan et al, 2023; Weismiller et al, 2021) leading to a potential ceiling effect. For example, the mean LOS sway angle for this study sample before rTMS application was 8.23 ± .77°, whereas the normative age matched value has been reported to be 7.00 to 7.11°.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%