2021
DOI: 10.1108/arla-03-2021-0063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual antecedents of i-deals: the role of self-efficacy, networking abilities and perceived employability

Abstract: PurposeThis study aims to examine the direct and indirect effects of self-efficacy, networking abilities and perceived employability on the negotiation of idiosyncratic deals (i-deals) between individual workers and their employers.Design/methodology/approachIn total, 213 managerial professionals – a non-random sample – working for different small and medium-sized enterprises from several industries in Argentina were surveyed online. Hypotheses were tested using structural equation modeling.FindingsThe results… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Discriminant validity was also confirmed by square roots of the AVE higher than the correlation values among the factors (Table 3) (Fornell and Larcker, 1981;Hair et al, 2010). Harman's (1979) single-factor test was performed to detect CMV (Marino et al, 2022). The variance explained by the structure in which all items are gathered in a single factor is 34.57% when the number of factors is forced to 1.…”
Section: Preliminary Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Discriminant validity was also confirmed by square roots of the AVE higher than the correlation values among the factors (Table 3) (Fornell and Larcker, 1981;Hair et al, 2010). Harman's (1979) single-factor test was performed to detect CMV (Marino et al, 2022). The variance explained by the structure in which all items are gathered in a single factor is 34.57% when the number of factors is forced to 1.…”
Section: Preliminary Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our sample size resembles that of other studies on RL (Javed et al ., 2020, 2021), cross-sectional design and small sample size prevent generalization of results. Future studies should conduct longitudinal and multisource studies (considering different stakeholders' views) and use experimental research designs (Marino et al. , 2022).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En este contexto, Rousseau (2005) identica cuatro características de los i-deals: (a) son negociados de manera individual por el empleado; (b) son heterogéneos, pudiendo el trabajador obtener benecios diferentes a los que perciben los demás trabajadores que cumplen un mismo rol o uno similar; (c) generan un beneficio mutuo, tanto para el empleado que logra satisfacer una necesidad personal como para la organización que logra un mayor compromiso o la retención de su colaborador; (d) varían en su alcance, existiendo acuerdos que incluyen términos puntuales y otros que involucran la totalidad de los aspectos de la relación. De este modo, por medio de la negociación de i-deals, se genera un escenario donde, por un lado, las organizaciones logran atraer, retener y motivar al talento humano más valioso y, por el otro, los empleados consiguen condiciones de empleo personalizadas y adaptadas a sus necesidades, intereses y motivaciones (Marino et al, 2021).…”
Section: El Papel Mediador De La Negociación De Acuerdos Idiosincráticosunclassified
“…Es importante señalar que este instrumento no sólo fue diseñado directamente en español sobre la base de otros instrumentos anglosajones validados (p. ej., Hornung et al, 2014;Rosen et al, 2013;Rousseau et al, 2009), sino que además exhibió propiedades psicométricas satisfactorias en contextos laborales hispano-parlantes (Marino et al, 2021). Los análisis de consistencia interna revelaron que la conabilidad de este instrumento resultó aceptable, reejada en coecientes alfa de Cronbach de 0,89 para la sub-escala de i-deals de tareas, de 0,88 para la sub-escala de i-deals de desarrollo, de 0,91 para la sub-escala de i-deals de flexibilidad y de 0,84 para la sub-escala de i-deals financieros.…”
Section: Variables E Instrumentosunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation