2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-017-3668-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual and Regional Christian Religion and the Consideration of Sustainable Criteria in Consumption and Investment Decisions: An Exploratory Econometric Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…• Some studies focused on religious and non-religious differences, finding that religious individuals adopt SC to a greater extent have a more SC than less or non-religious ones [52][53][54][55][56], while others proved the opposite [57][58][59][60][61].…”
Section: A Direct Relationship Between Religion and Sustainable Consumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• Some studies focused on religious and non-religious differences, finding that religious individuals adopt SC to a greater extent have a more SC than less or non-religious ones [52][53][54][55][56], while others proved the opposite [57][58][59][60][61].…”
Section: A Direct Relationship Between Religion and Sustainable Consumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But when the measure of religion reflects the individual's deeper commitment, such as the self-perceived level of religiosity, results are different. Indeed, the self-perceived level of religiosity has been found to positively correlate with self-reported sustainable household behaviours [54] and behaviours such as avoid buying products, pay higher taxes and accept cut in living standards for environmental reasons [70,71]. Reinforcing this argument, studies differentiating between an intrinsic and extrinsic orientation to religiosity [42] have shown that intrinsic religiosity predict positive SC outcomes while extrinsic religiosity does not [52,72,73].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the ranking presented in Section 4 is confirmed here, both in terms of size and significance: HIN > BUD > ISL > JUD > CHR. This ranking is supported by Gutsche [60], since this paper finds a significant impact of Christianity (i.e., Catholics and Protestants) only for minor pro-environmental behaviors, such as purchases of food and clothes; but it is in contrast with Hwang [61], where CHR > BUD, although this paper refers to pro-environmental intentions rather than observed behaviors. This ranking is partially supported by Arli and Tjiptono [62] (i.e., ISL > CHR) for impacts of intrinsic religiousness on attitudes towards environmental issues; and it is partially confirmed by Yang and Huang [63] (i.e., BUD > CHR) for public pro-environmental behaviors, such as donating to environmental protection, and participating in environmental activities organized by governmental and non-governmental organizations.…”
Section: Appendix D Statistical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…A learning integration model that links the concepts of religion and science in studying and succeeding in the ESD program is needed. Previous research shows how religious teachings influence sustainable development practices such as agriculture [25], economics [26] and solid waste management [27]. The rise of interest in religion in the context of international development must be welcomed [28] because understanding the dynamics of religion and the role of communities and religious actors is crucial for sustainable development [29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%