2004
DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2004.11511787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual and combined effects of shading and thinning chemicals on abscission and dry-matter accumulation of ‘Royal Gala’ apple fruit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that maximum values of AGR under grey and blue nets were 20% greater than control ( Figure 1B), and similar to those observed by Stanley et al (2000) in 'Royal Gala' apples in New Zealand, between 2-2.5 g d -1 , who also demonstrated a positive relation between AGR increment and final fruit size. Apple fruit growth rate is affected by availability of photo-assimilates for adequate cell division (McArtney et al, 2004;Zibordi et al, 2009), while more prolonged cell division phase normally leads to higher values of AGR in apples (Stanley et al, 2000). In our study, leaf photosynthesis under blue net was 28% higher than white net (Table 4), probably by a direct effect of PPFD reduction by shading due to leading to less stressful microclimate conditions and thus leading to greater net CO2 assimilation (Smit, 2007) and therefore more carbohydrate availability for adequate fruit growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that maximum values of AGR under grey and blue nets were 20% greater than control ( Figure 1B), and similar to those observed by Stanley et al (2000) in 'Royal Gala' apples in New Zealand, between 2-2.5 g d -1 , who also demonstrated a positive relation between AGR increment and final fruit size. Apple fruit growth rate is affected by availability of photo-assimilates for adequate cell division (McArtney et al, 2004;Zibordi et al, 2009), while more prolonged cell division phase normally leads to higher values of AGR in apples (Stanley et al, 2000). In our study, leaf photosynthesis under blue net was 28% higher than white net (Table 4), probably by a direct effect of PPFD reduction by shading due to leading to less stressful microclimate conditions and thus leading to greater net CO2 assimilation (Smit, 2007) and therefore more carbohydrate availability for adequate fruit growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of light conditions on apple fruit growth have been documented. Brief reduction of light intensity by heavy shading during early stages of fruit growth reduces apple fruit growth rate and induces fruit drop (McArtney et al, 2004), and it was closely related to decreases in photosynthesis and tree C assimilation (Zibordi et al, 2009). Light availability also affects fruit growth by affecting carbohydrate partitioning between fruit and shoots.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the post-bloom thinning period, at about 10-20 days after bloom, demand for carbohydrates and other nutrients from various sinks exceeds what the sources can supply (Lakso et al 1999). The carbon balance may integrate the negative eVects of shading, application of photosynthetic inhibitors, elevated temperatures on fruit abscission or the combined eVects of simultaneous shade and chemical thinners (McArtney et al 2004). Periods of shading or terbacil (photosynthetic-inhibiting herbicide) treatment that led to fruit abscission was shown to reduce nonstructural carbohydrates in the fruit (Polomski et al 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A decrease in the relative growth rates of fruit is apparent within 2 days after shading [18,19]. Fruit abscission begins at 5 to 10 days after shading and peaks at 15 days [20-22]. Therefore, reduction in fruit growth is an earlier response to shading, while fruit abscission is the final effect of shading on fruit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%