2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2cc30350g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indium(iii) catalysed substrate selective hydrothiolation of terminal alkynes

Abstract: In(OTf)(3) is reported as the first catalyst having the ability to selectively catalyse both Markovnikov and anti-Markovnikov hydrothiolation of terminal alkynes under identical reaction conditions depending upon the nature of the thiol employed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, catalytic reactions are known to mostly lead to the formation of mono‐addition products, consistent with Markovnikov’s rule, whereas radical‐type reactions tend to favor the formation of 1,2‐double‐addition products. However, Prajapati and co‐workers reported the reaction between aromatic and aliphatic thiols with alkynes in the presence of In(OTf) 3 leading to ( E )‐vinyl sulfides 26. We drew similar conclusions.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Interestingly, catalytic reactions are known to mostly lead to the formation of mono‐addition products, consistent with Markovnikov’s rule, whereas radical‐type reactions tend to favor the formation of 1,2‐double‐addition products. However, Prajapati and co‐workers reported the reaction between aromatic and aliphatic thiols with alkynes in the presence of In(OTf) 3 leading to ( E )‐vinyl sulfides 26. We drew similar conclusions.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Another example of regioselectivity control has been recently shown using catalytic amounts of In(OTf) 3 . Addition of heteroaromatic thiols to arylacetylenes proceeded in a Markovnikov‐type fashion leading to vinyl sulfides 6 in good yields 80–90 % (Scheme ), while aliphatic and aromatic thiols formed linear products 7 ( E / Z >5:1).…”
Section: Formation Of Monofunctionalized Akenes (Vinyl Chalcogenides)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example of regioselectivity control has been recently shown using catalytic amountso fI n(OTf) 3 . [34] Addition of heteroaromatic thiols to arylacetylenesp roceeded in aM arkovnikov-type fashion leadingt ov inyl sulfides 6 in good yields 80-90 %( Scheme 16), while aliphatic and aromatic thiols formed linear products 7 (E/Z > 5:1). Though no mechanistic investigations have been performed in this communication, it was assumed that depending on the thiol nucleophilicity, In(OTf) 3 may interact either with an alkyne to form acetylenide or with at hiol to form sulfide, thus leading to linear or branched products.…”
Section: Catalytic Systems Leadingt Om Arkovnikov-type (Branched)vinymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in 2012 Prajapati and co‐workers considered the importance of developing methods that used a single catalyst for different fundamental transformations in a single reaction flask 28. Based on this concept, they reported on the use of indium(III) triflate to catalyze both Markovnikov and anti‐Markovnikov hydrothiolation of terminal alkynes just by variation of the nature of the thiol employed 29. In particular, these studies revealed that heteroaromatic thiols Het‐SH (Het = benzothiazole, benzooxazole, thiazoline, pyridine) added selectively to aryl acetylenes in a Markovnikov fashion to give branched vinyl sulfides [Equation (6)], whereas aromatic and aliphatic thiols added to phenylacetylene in an anti‐Markovnikov way under the same conditions to afford mixtures of E and Z linear isomers with net prevalence of the former [Equation (7)].…”
Section: Metal‐catalyzed Hydrothiolation – Regioselectivity and Sterementioning
confidence: 99%