2018
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect vs direct assessment of gastric emptying: A randomized crossover trial comparing C‐isotope breath analysis and MRI

Abstract: Gastric emptying (GE) is an important element of gastrointestinal physiology. For clinical applications, highly accurate measurements of GE on an individual level are required for diagnosis.1 In a research setting GE measurements are often used to determine group differences in GE between treatments (for example. AbstractBackground: Indirect methods to assess gastric emptying (GE), such as 13 C breath tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(105 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Independent of intervention or time, gastric emptying of the solid meal was uniformly overestimated, a known limitation of indirect breath test fitting. 51 Yet, the unfitted percentage of 13 C recovery was unchanged after AXOS intervention compared to placebo (Supplemental Figure 3). Stool frequency, stool weight, stool moisture, and fasting H 2 remained unchanged, however, BSS scores increased from harder stool type 1-2 toward softer stool types 3-4 after AXOS intervention ( Table 2, Supplemental Figure 4).…”
Section: Softer Stool Consistency But No Changes In Whole Gut Transitmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Independent of intervention or time, gastric emptying of the solid meal was uniformly overestimated, a known limitation of indirect breath test fitting. 51 Yet, the unfitted percentage of 13 C recovery was unchanged after AXOS intervention compared to placebo (Supplemental Figure 3). Stool frequency, stool weight, stool moisture, and fasting H 2 remained unchanged, however, BSS scores increased from harder stool type 1-2 toward softer stool types 3-4 after AXOS intervention ( Table 2, Supplemental Figure 4).…”
Section: Softer Stool Consistency But No Changes In Whole Gut Transitmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There are various other techniques to assess GE rate, but the most common approaches are either indirect (C-isotope breath analysis and paracetamol absorption test), or involve the use of ionising radiation (gamma scintigraphy (72) ). Advantages of MRI are that it is well suited for individual GE assessment and less dependent on the food matrix than indirect tracer-based methods such as C-isotope breath analysis (73) . Quantification of postprandial volume changes with MRI has been shown to have low inter-observer variability, unless the stomach is nearly empty (74) .…”
Section: In Vivo Mri: Gastric Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 In two recent studies, participants received liquid meals at different viscosities and energy densities, and MRI was used to measure gastric content volumes every 10 min until 90 min after ingestion. 34,35 Results demonstrated higher gastric emptying half-time for a thick, high-calorie (500 kcal, 1 kcal/ml) meal, with approximately 80 min needed to reach 50% gastric emptying. Our pudding-like, semi-solid contrast meal had a higher caloric density (1.2 kcal/ml) and higher viscosity than a thick liquid, thus supporting the relatively slower gastric emptying rate demonstrated by our analysis compared to these prior studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, early gastric emptying rate has been shown to be determined by the meal volume but not its nutrient composition, using liquid meals 33 . In two recent studies, participants received liquid meals at different viscosities and energy densities, and MRI was used to measure gastric content volumes every 10 min until 90 min after ingestion 34,35 . Results demonstrated higher gastric emptying half‐time for a thick, high‐calorie (500 kcal, 1 kcal/ml) meal, with approximately 80 min needed to reach 50% gastric emptying.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%