Background
There is still no standard of care to manage thoracolumbar burst fractures.
With all the recent advances, posterior approaches are still one of the
mainstays of treatment. On the other hand, while spinal canal decompression
in neurological impaired patients is an important goal of treatment, its
technique remains controversial.
This study compared the effects of direct laminectomy decompression against
ligamentotaxis/indirect canal decompression on neurological and radiographic
improvements.
Methods
A prospective double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted on 60
thoracolumbar burst-fracture patients meeting our inclusion and exclusion
criteria. They were randomized into 2 treatment arms: (1) direct
decompression using laminectomy and (2) indirect decompression using
ligamentotaxis/distraction. Each patient was observed for 6 months, and
their neurological and radiographical data were collected prospectively.
Statistical analysis was done by the Student t test, Friedman test, Mann
Whitney-U test, Wilcoxon ranked test, and 1-way analysis of variance.
Results
Among 60 patients enrolled in our study, each treatment arm had an
improvement in Frankel scores but there was no difference between the groups
at any given time. After 6 months of surgery, local sagittal kyphosis
improved in both groups (from 32.2 to 7.43 and 29.93 to 8.77 for the
indirect and direct groups, respectively), as well as anterior vertebral
height ratio (from 57.73 to 70.7 and 62.17 to 66.27 for the indirect and
direct group, respectively) and posterior vertebral height ratio (from 61.17
to 74.87 and 64 to 67.5 for the indirect and direct group, respectively).
For between-group comparisons after 6 months, there was a significant
difference only for posterior vertebral height ratio (
P
=
0.040).
Conclusion
Posterior approaches with ligamentotaxis have shown to be safe and may
present the same outcome as direct decompression techniques using wide
laminectomy.