2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-005-0816-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect spinal canal decompression of vertebral burst fracture in calf model

Abstract: Short-segment posterior fixation followed by indirect spinal canal decompression led to an improvement over spinal canal retropulsion in experimental burst fractures. Furthermore, the kyphosis angle and segmental height values improved following the reduction compared with those before reduction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 [ 7 14 15 16 17 ] summarizes the literature describing the methods of creating a burst fractures in calf spine models. A method described by drop weight alone used a large weight (100 kg), yet produced burst fractures only in 13 of 24 specimens [ 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 [ 7 14 15 16 17 ] summarizes the literature describing the methods of creating a burst fractures in calf spine models. A method described by drop weight alone used a large weight (100 kg), yet produced burst fractures only in 13 of 24 specimens [ 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) at a speed of 40 mm/minute until there was a burst fracture at the weakest part in the middle vertebrae (T12 or L1). 6 Five specimens were fixed with anterior instrumentation alone, using 2 rods connected by 2 screws above and 2 screws below the fractured vertebra plus one tranverse connector. Another 5 specimens were fixed with our modified technique of combined anterior and posterior instrumentation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using longitudinal distraction, Ligamentotaxis is a vital procedure for spinal alignment and canal indirect decompression, causing bone fragments from the posterior wall to be reintroduced into the vertebral body ( 7 , 8 ). Few prospective clinical studies have been conducted to compare the effects of distraction movements on spinal alignment and canal decompression ( 9 - 11 ). On the other hand, research has shown that this method seems to be ineffective ( 12 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%