2008
DOI: 10.3354/meps07303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect predator effects on age-0 northern rock sole Lepidopsetta polyxystra: growth suppression and temporal reallocation of feeding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fish often face situations in nature where there is a potential tradeoff between increased feeding rate and reduced survival (Lima 1998;Mangel and Stamps 2001). For example, (i) open-water (pelagic habitats) may contain richer food resources but pose higher predation risk (e.g., Werner and Hall 1988;Gliwicz et al 2006), (ii) daytime foraging may yield a higher feeding rate but greater risk of predation than nocturnal foraging (e.g., Fraser and Metcalfe 1997;Metcalfe et al 1999;Ryer and Hurst 2008), and (iii) more active foragers may encounter more prey (or richer habitats) and grow faster but suffer higher mortality rates (e.g., Werner and Anholt 1993;Fraser et al 2001;Biro et al 2004Biro et al , 2006Sundström et al 2004). Fitness tradeoffs can also occur spatially (e.g., one area of a habitat favors one behavioral type, while another area favors a different one), temporally within generations (e.g., across development or across genetically linked behavioral traits), and temporally between generations (e.g., frequency-dependent selection).…”
Section: Behavioral / Personality Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fish often face situations in nature where there is a potential tradeoff between increased feeding rate and reduced survival (Lima 1998;Mangel and Stamps 2001). For example, (i) open-water (pelagic habitats) may contain richer food resources but pose higher predation risk (e.g., Werner and Hall 1988;Gliwicz et al 2006), (ii) daytime foraging may yield a higher feeding rate but greater risk of predation than nocturnal foraging (e.g., Fraser and Metcalfe 1997;Metcalfe et al 1999;Ryer and Hurst 2008), and (iii) more active foragers may encounter more prey (or richer habitats) and grow faster but suffer higher mortality rates (e.g., Werner and Anholt 1993;Fraser et al 2001;Biro et al 2004Biro et al , 2006Sundström et al 2004). Fitness tradeoffs can also occur spatially (e.g., one area of a habitat favors one behavioral type, while another area favors a different one), temporally within generations (e.g., across development or across genetically linked behavioral traits), and temporally between generations (e.g., frequency-dependent selection).…”
Section: Behavioral / Personality Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may also be necessary to account for the dependence of this interaction on body size, abiotic variables, and competitor or predator assemblages. In particular, very few studies have examined whether growth variation in YOY plaice is related to predation risk even though this factor may be a critical determinant of feeding and growth in young fishes such as YOY plaice (Burrows et al 1994, Burrows & Gibson 1995, Ryer & Hurst 2008. In addition, the extent to which spatial growth variation is driven by differences in growth performance through gen etic or non-genetic local adaptation requires testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%