1980
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.1980.238.5.h664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect mean arterial pressure in the anesthetized dog

Abstract: Using the oscillometric method, indirect mean arterial pressure was measured in 14 pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs (8-24 kg) with mean arterial pressure ranging from 23 to 160 mmHg. The effect of cuff size, in relation to forelimb circumference was investigated. Indirect mean arterial pressure agreed with direct mean arterial pressure when the cuff width was about 40% of the forelimb circumference.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
33
0
2

Year Published

1982
1982
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually this factor varied between 0.9 and 1.0. This linear extrapolation is justified on the basis of studies by Geddes et al (2,3) and Latshaw et al (8).…”
Section: Human Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Usually this factor varied between 0.9 and 1.0. This linear extrapolation is justified on the basis of studies by Geddes et al (2,3) and Latshaw et al (8).…”
Section: Human Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Referring to Figure 1, four measurements were made: [1] cuff pressure (S o ) where the oscillations suddenly increased during cuff deflation; [2] the amplitude (A s ) of cuff pressure oscillations for auscultatory systolic pressure; [3] the amplitude (A d ) of cuff pressure oscillations for auscultatory (Phase 5) diastolic pressure; [4] the maximal amplitude of cuff pressure oscillations (A m ). From the measured data, the value of S o ( cuff pressure for the sudden increase in cuff pressure oscillations) was compared with auscultatory systolic pressure (S K ).…”
Section: Human Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, recommendations for cuff sizes vary. One study determined optimum cuff width for indirect blood pressure measurements to be about one-fifth of the tail circumference (Latshaw et al 1979), while others recommended ratios of 0.35 (Muir et al 1983) and 0.25 (Geddes et al 1977), respectively. A recent study recommends a cuff with a ratio of 0.25 at the tail to provide the most accurate results when compared to invasive measurements (Tearney et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood pressure (mm/Hg) was measured by using automatic NIBP machine, mean arterial pressure was measured by indirect method (Geddes et al, 1980) using formula: MAP = DAP + (SAP -DAP)/3 (mm/Hg).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%