2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-7061(01)00154-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect estimation of near-saturated hydraulic conductivity from readily available soil information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter were, indeed, estimated by extrapolating the pattern of the unsaturated conductivity values to a zero pressure head value. However, few measurements were available that would have helped to define the fitting process for near-saturation pressure heads, where, as shown by Clothier and Smettem (1990) and Jarvis et al (2002), the structural macropores of soil can increase hydraulic conductivity by several orders of magnitude. In contrast to what happens for the upper soil layers, for layers 3 and 4 the univariate analysis of sensitivity (Fig.…”
Section: Model Parameters and Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter were, indeed, estimated by extrapolating the pattern of the unsaturated conductivity values to a zero pressure head value. However, few measurements were available that would have helped to define the fitting process for near-saturation pressure heads, where, as shown by Clothier and Smettem (1990) and Jarvis et al (2002), the structural macropores of soil can increase hydraulic conductivity by several orders of magnitude. In contrast to what happens for the upper soil layers, for layers 3 and 4 the univariate analysis of sensitivity (Fig.…”
Section: Model Parameters and Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The θ M parameter is defined at a specified ψ value, and ψ values of −0.015 m,−0.1 m,−0.3 m,−0.5 m,−0.6 m,−1 m, and −3.3 m have been used (e.g. Hall et al, 1977;de Witt and McQueen, 1992;Yu et al, 1993;Jarvis et al, 2002;Kutilek, 2004;Deeks et al, 2004;Drewry et al, 2008). In this study, ψ = −0.1 m (Jarvis et al, 2002) was used for reasons which will be elaborated later.…”
Section: Macroporosity and Matrix Porositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their lower values might be a result of the relatively high clay contents in the soil they studied (46%). Generally, a larger variation in K sat is observed in field samples from different types of soil because K sat in such samples is largely controlled by soil structural features, or macropores (Jarvis et al, 2002). Different textural properties cause different soil structural features.…”
Section: Moisture Retention Characteristicmentioning
confidence: 99%