2020
DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2020.1851058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect effect of patient outcome expectation on improvement through alliance quality: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also get the impression that successful therapeutic interventions and increased insight makes the relationship stronger because the patients experience that the therapist is helping them improve. A meta-review by Constantino et al found that when patients in CBT were more optimistic about how much therapy would help them (high outcome expectation) this had a moderate effect on higher alliance quality, which had small-to-moderate effect on better post-treatment outcomes [27]. Successful interventions and increased insight in the early course of treatment could lead to increased trust in the therapists' ability to help, which can create higher outcome expectations, which again could influence post-treatment outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also get the impression that successful therapeutic interventions and increased insight makes the relationship stronger because the patients experience that the therapist is helping them improve. A meta-review by Constantino et al found that when patients in CBT were more optimistic about how much therapy would help them (high outcome expectation) this had a moderate effect on higher alliance quality, which had small-to-moderate effect on better post-treatment outcomes [27]. Successful interventions and increased insight in the early course of treatment could lead to increased trust in the therapists' ability to help, which can create higher outcome expectations, which again could influence post-treatment outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This combined setting may have contributed to treatment adherence, since no rTMS session was missed for the ~5 months duration of rTMS acute and continuation treatments. Importantly, treatment adherence and expectations are known to be important contributors for better outcomes in various treatment modalities (Horwitz, 1993 ; Constantino et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instrument used in this study, the working alliance inventory (WAI; Horvath & Greenberg, 1989) is the most often used measure to investigate the relations between the alliance and treatment outcomes (Flückiger, Del Re, et al, 2018). The BP factor structure of the alliance over the course of treatment has been of continued interest to researchers and there is an ongoing debate whether WAI operationalizes a stable one, two, or three-factorial construct over the various stages of therapy (e.g., Andrusyna et al, 2001; Cirasola et al, 2020; Constantino et al, 2020; Corbière et al, 2006; Hukkelberg & Ogden, 2016; Kivlighan et al, 2016; Milot-Lapointe et al, 2020). The research using BP designs to investigate the factor structure of the WAI yielded inconsistent results.…”
Section: Longitudinal Investigations Of the Alliancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research using BP designs to investigate the factor structure of the WAI yielded inconsistent results. One of the likely reasons for this failure to converge is that all of the previous investigations modeled the alliance as a stable construct (e.g., Constantino et al, 2020; Falkenström et al, 2017; Flückiger, Rubel, et al, 2020; Zilcha-Mano, 2017). This constancy/stability assumption forecloses the opportunity to examine the possibility that clients’ conception of the important elements of the alliance likely evolves in later points in therapy or, indeed, that the items targeting agreements regarding goals, tasks, and the personal attachments to the therapists, are in these later stages become a proxy for a more evolved understanding of what the alliance means to clients.…”
Section: Longitudinal Investigations Of the Alliancementioning
confidence: 99%