2021
DOI: 10.5194/acp-2020-1264
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect contributions of global fires to surface ozone through ozone-vegetation feedback

Abstract: Abstract. Fire is an important source of surface ozone (O3), which causes damage to vegetation and reduces stomatal conductance. Such processes can feed back to inhibit dry deposition and indirectly enhance surface O3. Here, we apply a fully coupled chemistry-vegetation model to estimate the indirect contributions of global fires to surface O3 through O3-vegetation feedback during 2005–2012. Fire emissions directly increase the global mean annual O3 by 1.2 ppbv (5.0 %) with a maximum of 5.9 ppbv (24.4 %) avera… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 2021 study using both GFED and FINN, version 1.5, showed similar spatial pattern and seasonality of fire-induced PM 2•5 in the Amazon region, although the magnitude using GFED is slightly lower than that with FINN. 44 In conclusion, exposure to wildfire-related PM 2•5 was associated with an increased risk of all-cause, respiratory, and cardiovascular hospital admissions in Brazil. Children aged 0-9 years and adults aged 80 years and older were more susceptible to wildfire-related PM 2•5 than other age groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A 2021 study using both GFED and FINN, version 1.5, showed similar spatial pattern and seasonality of fire-induced PM 2•5 in the Amazon region, although the magnitude using GFED is slightly lower than that with FINN. 44 In conclusion, exposure to wildfire-related PM 2•5 was associated with an increased risk of all-cause, respiratory, and cardiovascular hospital admissions in Brazil. Children aged 0-9 years and adults aged 80 years and older were more susceptible to wildfire-related PM 2•5 than other age groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%