1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf00269569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect assessment of callus fresh weight by non-destructive methods

Abstract: The determination of rates of macroalgal growth and productivity via temporal fresh weight (FW) measurements is attractive, as it does not necessitate the sacrifice of biomass. However, there is no standardised method for FW analysis; this may lead to potential discrepancies when determining growth rates or productivity and make literature comparison problematic. This study systematically assessed a variety of lab-scale methods for macroalgal FW measurement for growth rate determination. Method efficacy was as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These calluses were subcultured every 3 weeks. The callus growth was measured by the Mottley's method (Mottley & Keen 1987). Cell suspensions were initiated from 5 weeks old friable calluses maintained on MSRT plus NAA (5.4 ~tM) and 2,4-D (4.5 ~tM).…”
Section: Dedifferentiated Culturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These calluses were subcultured every 3 weeks. The callus growth was measured by the Mottley's method (Mottley & Keen 1987). Cell suspensions were initiated from 5 weeks old friable calluses maintained on MSRT plus NAA (5.4 ~tM) and 2,4-D (4.5 ~tM).…”
Section: Dedifferentiated Culturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Although the relationship between the two-dimensional projected area of the tissue and fresh weight was not determined here, image analysis has been previously used to determine fresh weight of callus (Mottley and Keen 1987;Hirvonen and Ojamo 1988), cell growth (Olofsdotter 1993;Ibaraki and Kurata 1997) and in vitro plant growth (Smith and Spomer 1987).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore difficult to extract weeds from complex backgrounds [19,20]. At the same time, the phenotypic information for each plant is extracted as a predictive factor (e.g., measured value [21], leaf area index [22], pixel number [23]) to establish a single linear regression relationship with the fresh weight of the plant; this single-factor approach does not include sufficient information. The fresh weight of weeds is determined not by a single characteristic parameter but by a combination of multiple characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%