2008
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2006.093641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indigenous Ways of Knowing: Implications for Participatory Research and Community

Abstract: Researchers have a responsibility to cause no harm, but research has been a source of distress for indigenous people because of inappropriate methods and practices. The way researchers acquire knowledge in indigenous communities may be as critical for eliminating health disparities as the actual knowledge that is gained about a particular health problem. Researchers working with indigenous communities must continue to resolve conflict between the values of the academic setting and those of the community. It is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
326
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 398 publications
(342 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
326
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As illustrated by Cochran et al (2008), how knowledge is acquired is as important, if not more important, than the knowledge gained, especially in efforts to eliminate or reduce health disparities. Therefore, community involvement and cultural consultation are utilized throughout program and curriculum development and implementation to assure that traditional learning styles are being implemented accurately and appropriately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As illustrated by Cochran et al (2008), how knowledge is acquired is as important, if not more important, than the knowledge gained, especially in efforts to eliminate or reduce health disparities. Therefore, community involvement and cultural consultation are utilized throughout program and curriculum development and implementation to assure that traditional learning styles are being implemented accurately and appropriately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reasons for these criticisms is that "the purposes and meaning associated with [research on Aboriginal communities] by academics and government agents were usually alien to the Aboriginal people themselves and the outcomes were, as often as not, misguided and harmful" (Castellano, 2004, p. 98). Therefore, research has historically been a source of unease and distress in Aboriginal populations (Arbour & Cook, 2006;Castellano, 2004;Cochran et al, 2008). Some of the criticisms include "lack of involvement of the community in the planning of the project, insensitivity to cultural beliefs, … potential stigma of research results, lack of feedback to the community once a project is completed, commercial ownership of DNA and overall impressions of exploitation of the communities" (Arbour & Cook, 2006).…”
Section: A Review Of Notable Biological Sampling Cases and Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that many people believed this story illustrates the negative reputation of academic researchers among many Aboriginal peoples. These cases, and others like it, have been brought to public attention and have prompted some Aboriginal communities to become extremely cautious about research and for some to develop their own research guidelines (Arbour & Cook, 2006;Cochran et al, 2008).…”
Section: A Review Of Notable Biological Sampling Cases and Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PAR is an effective method of research that engages communities in research and knowledge development. Due to its inherent principles of cultural sensitivity, inclusion, community decision-making, empowerment, respect, and emancipation, PAR is particularly fitting for research with Aboriginal people (Cochran et al, 2008;Maar et al, 2011;Purden, 2005).…”
Section: Participatory Action Research (Par)mentioning
confidence: 99%