2021
DOI: 10.17953/aicrj.45.1.atalay_etal
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indigenous Studies Working Group Statement

Abstract: In 2018, the authors were invited to share their perspectives as Indigenous studies scholars to the work of Breakthrough Listen, an organization affiliated with both the Berkeley SETI Research Center (BSRC) and the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI). This collectively authored statement highlights some of the ethical concerns these authors perceived regarding the history colonialism and the expectations to find “advanced” or “intelligent” extraterrestrial life. A prologue contextualizes the short … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BL posed the question: "what would you most want SETI scientists to know about potentially making contact?" Atalay et al (2021) presented the Indigenous Studies Working Group Statement in response to BL's question, recommending the creation of a Mission Statement to clearly answer ethical questions about why to search, whether the search can be harmful, whether ET life can refuse contact, and to acknowledge the non-objective nature of terms used in the field (e.g. "intelligent," "advanced," and even "life").…”
Section: Indigenous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BL posed the question: "what would you most want SETI scientists to know about potentially making contact?" Atalay et al (2021) presented the Indigenous Studies Working Group Statement in response to BL's question, recommending the creation of a Mission Statement to clearly answer ethical questions about why to search, whether the search can be harmful, whether ET life can refuse contact, and to acknowledge the non-objective nature of terms used in the field (e.g. "intelligent," "advanced," and even "life").…”
Section: Indigenous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%