2002
DOI: 10.1353/aiq.2003.0009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indigenous Scholars versus the Status Quo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That said, this study excluded nonrefereed publications from popular databases and publishing platforms, which may be a more normative standard for not only local and Traditional stakeholders but also the practitioners and researchers collaborating with these communities. Stakeholder groups with non-Western values and perspectives may not desire to share their data and perspectives on mainstream publishing platforms-and likely face substantial hurdles in doing so (Mihesuah and Wilson 2002). Only when we raise awareness in the academic community, teach students and early career researchers of the systemic challenges, empower non-Western academics and Knowledge holders, and demand changes to publication standards and access will non-Western voices and values begin to reach broader audiences (Seekamp et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That said, this study excluded nonrefereed publications from popular databases and publishing platforms, which may be a more normative standard for not only local and Traditional stakeholders but also the practitioners and researchers collaborating with these communities. Stakeholder groups with non-Western values and perspectives may not desire to share their data and perspectives on mainstream publishing platforms-and likely face substantial hurdles in doing so (Mihesuah and Wilson 2002). Only when we raise awareness in the academic community, teach students and early career researchers of the systemic challenges, empower non-Western academics and Knowledge holders, and demand changes to publication standards and access will non-Western voices and values begin to reach broader audiences (Seekamp et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Historian Devon Abbott Mihesuah (Choctaw) analyzes some of the gendered and racialized dynamics within AIM. 17 Both Mihesuah and Elizabeth Castle cover additional ground on Indigenous women in AIM, offering valuable insights into gender relations and the interplay between Indigenous women and Western feminism. 18 Similarly, in her comparative analysis of women' s participation in the male-dominated Black Panther Party and the American Indian Movement, Castle points to women of color's struggle for racial and sexual equality and their dedication to community.…”
Section: The Red Power Movement and Indigenous Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…60 Within their tribal structures, they were less concerned with Western perspectives on women's liberation (which categorized women in terms of mother and housewife and sought to break away from this). 61 Rather, Indigenous women perceived their place and position from a cultural perspective in which womanhood and motherhood were traditionally respected and seen as an integral part of tribal society. Indigenous womanhood is thus frequently regarded as the source of cultural persistence against the relentless assimilationist onslaught of various settler colonial policies.…”
Section: Gender Relations and Sexual Politics Within Aimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These practices at times also manifest in these selfproclaimed spokespersons for the colonized others whose spokespersonship is itself discursively colonizing and objectifying, as demonstrated by asking those "others" to "source" their own lived histories and experiences. It can also be seen in informal material practices of power, like when those spokespersons keep those "others" capable of disrupting their knowledge claims through their conscious body-political positioning that inverts the subject-object relationship at bay, ensuring that they have no point of entry into the academy, and only allowing for the entry of those who engage in sanctioned epistemologies and research practices (Mihesuah & Wilson, 2002).…”
Section: Before: Colonizing Epistemologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%