Indigenous residential segregation in towns and cities, 1976–2016

Abstract

Indigenous people tend to live in different parts of Australian towns and cities than the non-Indigenous population. This is due to a combination of historic and contemporary government policies, the agency of Indigenous people, and the constraints placed on residential location by the interaction of the housing and labour markets. This study traces the trajectory of Indigenous residential segregation in 60 Australian towns and cities, using census data from 1976 to 2016. Segregation is measured using the index of dissimilarity and the threshold method. Indigenous residential segregation has been declining steadily since 1976 nationally. However, there has been a great deal of variation in segregation trajectories among towns and cities. In Sydney and Melbourne, segregation remained relatively high over the study period. The level of segregation in 1976 appears to be related to the geographical remoteness of the town, with remote towns generally having lower levels of segregation in 1976. Segregation has been decreasing most rapidly in regional towns in New South Wales and Queensland. Finally, this study has found a long-run increase in the proportion of Indigenous residents living in highly Indigenous neighbourhoods, consistent with the increasingly close settlement of Indigenous people in Australian towns and cities. This trend is at odds with the apparent decrease in segregation found when segregation is measured using the index of dissimilarity. Detailed case studies may be required that examine how concrete historical geographies and policy legacies combine with contemporary housing markets to produce the configuration of segregation that we see today.

Self-determination’s land rights: Destined to disappoint?

“…Those living on Aboriginal land in the Northern Territory are not only the most impoverished people in Australia, but also they are becoming relatively poorer. 48 This trend is the result of policy to discourage and even financially penalise those who live on their country. The most recent estimates from a Centre for Appropriate Technology (2016) survey indicated that there are over 600 homelands in the Northern Territory.…”

“…The ALRA remains the most progressive and comprehensive land rights law in Australia. It has delivered a form of inalienable collective title over an estimated [48][49][50] per cent of the Northern Territory (635,000-650,000 sq kms) -with exact acreage remaining difficult to calculate because some claims are still being legally resolved. Ownership of land has afforded many 1 I would like to thank Sana Nakata, Melinda Hinkson, Shino Konishi, Michael Dillon, Karrina Nolan and the editors of this book for critical engagement with an earlier version of this chapter.…”

Off-White: decentring Whiteness in tobacco science

“… 38 Segregation of Indigenous people onto reservations, missions and reserves 39 effectively reduced their ability to participate in the cash economy or to own homes, while both implicit and explicit policies segregated Indigenous people in urban neighbourhoods and in educational settings. 40–42 Because many academic institutions privilege enrolment of the children of alumni, the legacy of exclusionary policies can endure and continue to perpetuate harms well beyond the overt end of these policies. When scientists are predominantly academics, they will therefore tend to be White elites.…”