2021
DOI: 10.1177/11771801211004773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indigenous peoples’ experiences and preferences in aged residential care: a systematic review

Abstract: Although the demand for aged residential care increases, low use of aged residential care by Indigenous people raises questions about unrecognised barriers to health care. The objectives of this systematic literature review are to (a) examine current scientific literature that reports older Indigenous people’s experiences in aged residential care and (b) describe critical factors that shape Indigenous people’s preferences in aged residential care settings. We conducted a systematic review of studies using an o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 Notably, the failure to properly value and engage with older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and families has resulted in additional challenges and inequalities in accessing aged care services, with implications for workforce planning. 2,[26][27][28] Moreover, the collaboration between health services and aged care assessment should underpin streamlined evaluation, especially in regional and remote areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Notably, the failure to properly value and engage with older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and families has resulted in additional challenges and inequalities in accessing aged care services, with implications for workforce planning. 2,[26][27][28] Moreover, the collaboration between health services and aged care assessment should underpin streamlined evaluation, especially in regional and remote areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results from an earlier systematic literature review using Betancourt et al’s (2003) multi-level framework for addressing racial and ethnic disparities in health and health care suggest that the provision of culturally responsive care may influence the uptake of ARC services offered to elderly Indigenous people (Keelan et al, 2021). New Zealand’s current socio-cultural context privileges a dominant Western-focussed discourse that is reflected in training institutions and health services (Mikahere-Hall, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify knowledge gaps and inform potential questions for the interview schedule (Keelan et al, 2021). Interview questions were devised using Betancourt et al’s (2003) multi-level framework to generate kaumātua and whānau systems perspectives of ARC.…”
Section: Interview Schedulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conducted a systematic literature review to identify and include additional organisational barriers and knowledge gaps used to inform the study interview schedule. 12 Interview questions were devised using Betancourt's et al 11 cultural competence framework in combination with the findings from our systematic literature to generate a comprehensive systems perspective of ARC. We considered issues related to the non-alignment of ARC provision with Māori cultural values and preferences for care, lack of cultural diversity in healthcare leadership and workforce, the absence of Māori health models in healthcare delivery and the inflexible nature of rating assessments when assessing the need of older Indigenous people for ARC.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 We aimed to use these factors to identify and analyse barriers that may contribute to, and maintain racial disparities in ARC. 12 The authors note that the structural and clinical-level factors associated with older Māori and whānau healthcare access to ARC are reported elsewhere in separate papers.…”
Section: Highlightsmentioning
confidence: 98%