Indigenous Peoples and Multiscalar Environmental Governance: The Opening and Closure of Participatory Spaces

Abstract

There has been an unprecedented inclusion of Indigenous peoples in environmental governance instruments like free, prior, and informed consent; reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) projects; climate adaptation initiatives; and environmental impact assessment. We draw on theories of participatory governance to show how locally implemented processes have been shaped by their interactions with invited, closed, and indigenous-led spaces at multiple scales. Empirically, our article is based on field research in Latin America, semistructured interviews, and a systematic literature review. We find four main barriers that have (re-)produced environmental injustices in environmental governance: first, a lack of influence over the institutional design of governance instruments; second, the exclusion of Indigenous peoples in the domestication of global instruments; third, policy incoherencies constraining the scope for decision-making; and fourth, weak cross-scale linkages between Indigenous-led spaces. This article helps to elucidate constraints of participatory spaces and identify leeway for transformation toward environmental justice.

Foreign corporate accountability: The contested institutionalization of mandatory due diligence in France and Germany

“…In transnational governance, there is a structural risk that rights and the perspectives of marginalized groups in the Global South are not sufficiently taken into consideration (cf. Gustafsson & Schilling-Vacaflor, 2022). By comparing discourses and their institutionalization in France and Germany, we explicitly address the impact of ideological power shaping policy designs.…”

Towards effective ecological restoration: Investigating knowledge co‐production on fish–habitat relationships with Aquatic Habitat Toronto

“…Other important considerations pertaining to inclusion include associated roles of partners, degree of formality or informality during processes, and how collaboration is expected to take place (Young, 2020). This trade‐off of ‘inclusion and exclusion’ is particularly notable when it comes to the exclusion of Indigenous peoples, who have historically been marginalized from participation (Gustafsson & Schilling‐Vacaflor, 2022).…”

Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future

“…Lessons in forest land restoration from northern Thailand show that power imbalances between national governance bodies and local communities can lead to suboptimal outcomes (Sapkota et al, 2021). Without inclusion of affected communities in the process of forming global policies and of translating global policies into domestic policies, participation in governance may not yield positive outcomes (Gustafsson & Schilling-Vacaflor, 2022).…”