Instruments, Methods, and Missions for Astrobiology VIII 2004
DOI: 10.1117/12.566491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indigenous microfossils in carbonaceous meteorites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 During the past 14 years, many large, complex filaments, consortia and mat assemblages have been found with undeniable biological characteristics that were interpreted as indigenous microfossils in carbonaceous meteorites during both independent and collaborative SEM, ESEM and FESEM investigations carried out in the United States and Russia. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Many of the filamentous and coccoidal microstructures found during this research were consistent with forms found half a century ago by earlier researchers (e.g., Nagy, Claus, Fitch, Palik, Timofeyev and van Landingham) and interpreted as indigenous microfossils of blue-green algae (cyanophytes), bacteria, and acritarchs or dismissed as recent bacterial contaminants or pollen grains. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] The filaments detected at NASA/MSFC were imaged with secondary and backscattered electron detectors and analyzed by EDS to obtain spot data and 2D x-ray maps at voltages ranging from 5 keV to 15 keV.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 During the past 14 years, many large, complex filaments, consortia and mat assemblages have been found with undeniable biological characteristics that were interpreted as indigenous microfossils in carbonaceous meteorites during both independent and collaborative SEM, ESEM and FESEM investigations carried out in the United States and Russia. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Many of the filamentous and coccoidal microstructures found during this research were consistent with forms found half a century ago by earlier researchers (e.g., Nagy, Claus, Fitch, Palik, Timofeyev and van Landingham) and interpreted as indigenous microfossils of blue-green algae (cyanophytes), bacteria, and acritarchs or dismissed as recent bacterial contaminants or pollen grains. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] The filaments detected at NASA/MSFC were imaged with secondary and backscattered electron detectors and analyzed by EDS to obtain spot data and 2D x-ray maps at voltages ranging from 5 keV to 15 keV.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Coccoidal forms and filaments had been found in carbonaceous meteorites by earlier workers and interpreted as indigenous remains of algae, acritarchs, cyanobacteria or other filamentous trichomic prokaryotes. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Entirely independent SEM studies of the Murchison (CM2) and Efremovka (CO2) carbonaceous meteorites were carried out in Moscow by Rozanov and his co-workers at the Paleontological Institute (PIN) and at the Institute of Microbiology (INMI) of the Russian Academy of Sciences. They had detected a large suite filaments in entirely different samples from the meteorite collection of the Vernadsky Institute with similar sizes and morphologies to those found at NASA/MSFC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3c & d) surrounded with high carbon (kerogen) sheaths. 34 It is important to note that the ability of a small number of microorganisms to multiply by binary fission into phenomenally large numbers in short time periods when conditions are suitable have been well known to microbiologists. …”
Section: Comets Meteor Streams and Meteoritesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations have been carried out in the United States at the NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center (Hoover, 1997Hoover and Rozanov, 2003;Hoover et al, 1998Hoover et al, , 2004a and in Russia at the Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences (Zhmur et al, 1997;Gerasimenko et al, 1999;Rozanov and Hoover, 2002). The work at NASA has involved the study of the freshly fractured interior surfaces of most major groups of …”
Section: Recent Evidence For Microfossils In Carbonaceous Meteoritesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of cryoconite microbial ecosystems have provided new data concerning the microbial compositions of communities that thrive in water films surrounding rocks 15 embedded in the ice of glaciers and the polar ice caps. Hoover et al (1986Hoover et al ( , 2001Hoover et al ( , 2004a have suggested that pockets and pools of meltwater trapped in interior cavities just beneath the comet crust could sustain pressures sufficiently high to allow the existence of liquid water for periods of time sufficient to allow growth of microorganisms and the formation of microbial mats. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%