1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-8401(96)01129-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indigenous knowledge of the feeding value of tree fodder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They were able to recognize the vast majority of tree species (>80%), and recall details about their uses, attributes (e.g., canopy size and shape and tree height), fodder value and effects on adjacent pasture. This concurs with studies of farmers' knowledge about fodder trees in contrasting cultural contexts as far apart as Asia (Thapa et al, 1997) and Africa (Roothaert and Franzel, 2001) as well as elsewhere in Latin America (Cajas-Girón and Love and Spaner, 2005;Barrance et al, 2009), where farmers have been found to select trees for retention or planting based on detailed knowledge of both fodder quality (Thorne et al, 1999) and attributes conferring low competitiveness with crops or pasture (Thapa et al, 1997). The importance of trees in providing shade and a favorable microclimate for cattle, articulated by farmers in all four landscapes in the present study, is corroborated by animal science research showing lower rectal temperatures and respiratory rates and hence higher welfare and production under tree shade (Valtorta et al, 1997).…”
Section: Impacts Of Farm Management On Dispersed Treessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…They were able to recognize the vast majority of tree species (>80%), and recall details about their uses, attributes (e.g., canopy size and shape and tree height), fodder value and effects on adjacent pasture. This concurs with studies of farmers' knowledge about fodder trees in contrasting cultural contexts as far apart as Asia (Thapa et al, 1997) and Africa (Roothaert and Franzel, 2001) as well as elsewhere in Latin America (Cajas-Girón and Love and Spaner, 2005;Barrance et al, 2009), where farmers have been found to select trees for retention or planting based on detailed knowledge of both fodder quality (Thorne et al, 1999) and attributes conferring low competitiveness with crops or pasture (Thapa et al, 1997). The importance of trees in providing shade and a favorable microclimate for cattle, articulated by farmers in all four landscapes in the present study, is corroborated by animal science research showing lower rectal temperatures and respiratory rates and hence higher welfare and production under tree shade (Valtorta et al, 1997).…”
Section: Impacts Of Farm Management On Dispersed Treessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The anthropogenic landscapes of mid-elevation in the Himalayas function as complex agroecosystems, where management and conservation need to balance local knowledge, practices and needs by a diversity of local users, and with global aims such as conservation of biodiversity, climate change mitigation and sustainability for future users. A high diversity of woody species is important as it provides a broad resource base for fodder collection throughout the year, as hill farmers have a sophisticated set of criteria for assessing fodder quality in relation to season, livestock type, and qualitative properties [61]. Biodiversity conservation needs to be seen in a broader sense in areas dominated by poverty and social inequity.…”
Section: Species Richness and Forest Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farmers may possess knowledge of morphological, physiological and ecological features of native tree species (Altieri and Merrick 1987;Castillo and Toledo 2000) that could be useful in designing alternative systems and practices to meet new challenges (Thapa et al 1997;Sinclair and Walker 1999). Escamilla et al (1994) reported on traditional tree species selection according to utilitarian criteria, environmental adaptation and crop compatibility in Mexico while Muschler (2001), highlighted the relationship among productive objectives, climatic factors, input levels and quality, in coffee systems in Costa Rica, where the relationship between local criteria and farmers' decisionmaking for establishing shade trees has been well identified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%