Indigenous knowledge and federal environmental assessments in Canada: applying past lessons to the 2019 impact assessment act

Abstract

Policy-makers ideally pursue well-informed, socially just means to make environmental decisions. Indigenous peoples have used Indigenous knowledge (IK) to inform decisions about environmental management for millennia. In the last 50 years, many western societies have used environmental assessment (EA) processes to deliberate on industrial proposals, informed by scientific information. Recently EA processes have attempted to incorporate IK in some countries and regions, but practitioners and scholars have criticized the ability of EA to meaningfully engage IK. Here we consider these tensions in Canada, a country with economic focus on resource extraction and unresolved government-to-government relationships with Indigenous Nations. In 2019, the Canadian government passed the Impact Assessment Act, reinvigorating dialogue on the relationship between IK and EA. Addressing this opportunity, we examined obstacles between IK and EA via a systematic literature review, and qualitative analyses of publications and the Act itself. Our results and synthesis identify obstacles preventing the Act from meaningfully engaging IK, some of which are surmountable (e.g., failures to engage best practices, financial limitations), whereas others are substantial (e.g., knowledge incompatibilities, effects of colonization). Finally, we offer recommendations for practitioners and scholars towards ameliorating relationships between IK and EA towards improved decision-making and recognition of Indigenous rights.

“Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management

“…Defining Indigenous knowledge is shifting away from a focus of "utility" (what it can do for Western science) and reductionism (how it provides “data” to Western scientific analyses). However, delineating what Indigenous knowledge is and how it operates has remained largely the purview of external organizations, governments, institutions and researchers rather than by Indigenous peoples them/ourselves (Battiste & Henderson, 2000; Eckert et al, 2020; McGregor, 2004a). The associated terminology has been evolving—away from "tradition" or "folk" terms (e.g.…”

Indigenous Knowledge Systems in Environmental Governance in Canada

“…In the end, however, Indigenous legal orders and governance were not reflected in the final Impact Assessment legislation and the resultant IK policy and guidance. In this instance, the opportunity existed for the implementation of a different paradigm based on knowledge exchange and shared decision-making, but this was rejected in favour of the decades-old status quo (Eckert et al 2020).…”

Weaving Indigenous knowledge systems and Western sciences in terrestrial research, monitoring and management in Canada: A protocol for a systematic map

“…Bridging multiple knowledge systems in environmental research and management improves our understanding of socio‐ecological connections and mechanisms (Kimmerer, 1998; Kutz & Tomaselli, 2019; Pierotti & Wildcat, 2000), and builds trust in decision‐making and research findings (Patterson et al., 2020). The weaving of knowledge systems can also facilitate uptake of findings by different decision‐making bodies that can help implement actions towards conservation of ecosystems (Ban et al., 2018; Eckert et al., 2020). Ultimately, it can serve to address ongoing issues related to the power and agency of Indigenous knowledge holders to inform decision‐making (Wheeler et al., 2020) by shaping decision spaces and mechanisms where Indigenous and Western knowledge systems are viewed as equally important (IPBES, 2019; Tengö et al., 2014).…”