1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf01579672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indigenous ecological knowledge systems and development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This lack of participation in setting up the projects' priority areas and goals has been identified as one of main reasons for the limited success of such initiatives (Nyong et al, 2007). Beyond being excluded from setting the goals, project participants are often forced to strongly adjust themselves to externally defined requirements, despite the general postulation for incorporating traditional knowledge in development projects (Woodley, 1991). In the case of the analyzed project, for example, it was widely ignored that NTFP collection is traditionally based on clearly separable individually managed units (Chirif, 2010) although the trees themselves are perceived as common pool resources (Tedder et al, 2002).…”
Section: Externally Imposed Activities Not Compatible With Local Realmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This lack of participation in setting up the projects' priority areas and goals has been identified as one of main reasons for the limited success of such initiatives (Nyong et al, 2007). Beyond being excluded from setting the goals, project participants are often forced to strongly adjust themselves to externally defined requirements, despite the general postulation for incorporating traditional knowledge in development projects (Woodley, 1991). In the case of the analyzed project, for example, it was widely ignored that NTFP collection is traditionally based on clearly separable individually managed units (Chirif, 2010) although the trees themselves are perceived as common pool resources (Tedder et al, 2002).…”
Section: Externally Imposed Activities Not Compatible With Local Realmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Here, indigenous knowledge refers to institutionalised local knowledge, which was built on and passed on intergenerationally by word of mouth. It is the basis for local-level decision-making in many rural communities regarding environmental issues, and is deeply attentive to place-based mitigation practices, as well as the relationships between (shifting) environmental contexts and livelihood practices (Woodley, 1991;Osunade, 1994). In the African Sahel region, for example, indigenous knowledge has provided extensive mitigation and adaptation strategies that have reduced community vulnerability to changing climate (Nyong et al, 2007).…”
Section: Climate Finance Using Indigenous Knowledge To Mitigate the Impacts Of Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Climate change could have positive, negative or no impact on each pest. There is need for better models to assess their global impact as most pest population prediction models have different spatial and temporal scales than global climate models (Woodley, 1991). Pests are usually controlled by cultural practices, natural enemies, host plant resistance, biopesticides and synthetic pesticides.…”
Section: Cultural Pest Control (M = 283)mentioning
confidence: 99%