2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indices of whole-body and central adiposity for evaluating the metabolic load of obesity

Abstract: BACKGROUND:To assess the relative metabolic load or risk imposed by fatness, fat mass (FM) is commonly expressed as a proportion of weight (% fat), while central adiposity is assessed using the ratio of triceps (TRI) to subscapular (SUBS) skinfolds. The statistical validity of these indices, defined as independence of the index from its denominator, has received inadequate evaluation. OBJECTIVE: To critically examine commonly used obesity indices, and to propose more appropriate approaches. DESIGN: Cross-secti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
61
3
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
61
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed previously, [19][20][21][22] this is not the most informative way to express body composition data. An alternative approach involves adjusting both LM and FM for height, generating the lean mass index (LMI ¼ LM/HT 2 ) and fat mass index (FMI ¼ FM/HT 2 ).…”
Section: C Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As discussed previously, [19][20][21][22] this is not the most informative way to express body composition data. An alternative approach involves adjusting both LM and FM for height, generating the lean mass index (LMI ¼ LM/HT 2 ) and fat mass index (FMI ¼ FM/HT 2 ).…”
Section: C Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…26 Equally, %fat provides a problematic ranking of fatness as discussed previously. 22 Garrow and Webster 27 argued that when assessing the validity of BMI as a proxy for fatness, the optimum index of fatness to use as the reference is FMI, as both indices are adjusted for height. The extent to which BMI reflects FMI is of course determined by the contribution to WT of LM.…”
Section: C Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 FMI is preferred to percentage fat as an index of fatness, as HT is a more appropriate aspect of body size than weight to adjust for. However, it is also useful to consider fatness in relation to the mass of metabolically active tissue, 28 so using log-log analysis the ratio FM/LM n was also calculated, where the power of n was 2.7. These values were multiplied by 10 000 to improve clarity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many ratios are statistically flawed, since dividing one variable by another does not necessarily achieve an appropriate adjustment of the numerator for the denominator, as discussed previously. 22 The approach we adopted was as follows. First, girth data were log-transformed using natural logarithms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%