1999
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-29-7-898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indices of interspecific plant competition for <i>Pinus radiata</i> in the central north island of New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The set of indices listed in Table 2 was selected based on their successful performance in previous studies examining competitive interactions in forest stands (e.g. Biging & Dobbertin 1992; Richardson et al . 1999) and to represent a range of complexity (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The set of indices listed in Table 2 was selected based on their successful performance in previous studies examining competitive interactions in forest stands (e.g. Biging & Dobbertin 1992; Richardson et al . 1999) and to represent a range of complexity (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that the choice of growth models using these interaction indices is determined by the study conditions. For example, Richardson et al . (1999) used an exponential growth model as their data were limited to very young seedlings, which have been shown to exhibit exponential growth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Competition can have an immediate effect on diameter but a delayed effect on height growth (Richardson et al 1999). Similarly, other factors such as growing space and mixture were nonsignificant over one year but substantial over four years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Height is often considered somewhat insensitive to competition relative to radial growth (McDonald and Fiddler, 1989;Wagner and Radosevich, 1998;Richardson et al, 1999). Ideally we would have compared the patterns of diameter and height growth for the various relative crown positions before Ceanothus was removed.…”
Section: Positive and Negative Effects Of Ceanothus On Conifer Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%