Indicators Of Precarious Employment In The Formal Economy In Russia, Quantitative Evaluation

Odintsova, Ye.

doi:10.19181/1999-9836-2018-10001

Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia

2018

DOI: 10.19181/1999-9836-2018-10001

|View full text |Cite

Indicators Of Precarious Employment In The Formal Economy In Russia, Quantitative Evaluation

Ye. Odintsova

Abstract: The Object of the Study. Precarious employment. The Subject of the Study. Indicators for the quantitative estimation of the prevalence of precarious employment in the formal economy in Russia.The Purpose of the Study. Еvaluation of the prevalence of the precarious employment phenomena in the employment sphere in Russia. The Main Provisions of the Article. The system of indicators of precarious employment involving estimation based on the analysis of the forms and conditions of employment applicable to employe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2022

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Impact of Employment De-Standardisation on its Quality: Reflections on Academic Discussion at the VI St. Petersburg International Labour Forum

Bobkov

Veredyuk

2022

Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The transformation of traditional models and forms of employment raises questions both about the impact of such processes on the quality of employment and about the mainstreaming of these issues into contemporary academic discourse. The purpose of the article is to analyze and assess the impact of de-standardisation of employment on its quality based on the materials - digests of participants' presentations - of the academic discussion held as part of the VI St. Petersburg International Labour Forum in March 2022. During the discussion, employment quality was at the intersection of approaches and principles shaping it (decent work, work-life balance); megatrends ((anti)globalisation of economy, digitalisation, population ageing); macro development conditions (quality of growth, quality of life of population); short- and medium-term consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic; initial labour market response to geopolitical tensions, significantly increased in 2022; and employment precarisation. The variety of angles in this discussion enabled the authors to form a general idea of the current debate on the quality of employment and its perspectives. Objective of the article is employment quality. Subject is employment de-standardization, understood as a shift of employment from the model of direct relations between the employee and the employer on the terms of a standard employment contract with appropriate rights and guarantees. The first result of the article is that it captures the most prominent issues of the recent academic debate on employment quality. The second result is the conclusion about the fragmented theoretical concepts of employment quality in Russia, limiting their application in public policies. The third resultis recommendations on the content of systemic approaches to measuring employment quality to assess its impact on living standards and include in the system of macroeconomic development indicators.

show abstract

Impact of Employment De-Standardisation on its Quality: Reflections on Academic Discussion at the VI St. Petersburg International Labour Forum

Bobkov

Veredyuk

2022

Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Significant Indicators of Precarious Employment and Their Priority

Bobkov

Odintsova

Ivanova

et al. 2022

Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article is devoted to the problem of identifying significant indicators of precarious employment and their priority, the solution of which was based on the authors: 1) checking indicators for multicollinearity, for which, based on the processing of data from the Federal State Statistics Service and The Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey - Higher School of Economics (RLMS-HSE), an array of data was generated for the period 2010-2020; 2) checking indicators based on expert assessments of Russian specialists collected in 2022 during a survey specially organized by the authors. Taking into account the integration of the verification results by two methods, the indicators of the initial list proposed by the authors were clarified and verified and the final list of indicators of precarious employment was formed. The final list includes indicators that make it possible to identify objective (taking into account the assessment of the type of registration of employment and employment conditions) and subjective (taking intoaccount the assessment of the presence of instability of the labor situation and dissatisfaction with employment and its conditions) manifestations of precarious employment in relation to Russian conditions. The prioritization of indicators of precarious employment was carried out and three groups of indicators were identified by priority level to characterize its manifestations: with a high (key indicators), medium and below medium priority level. The boundary for the indicator of the level of income from basic employment, which does not ensure the stability of the financial situation of households, has been clarified. It was revealed that precarious employment, regardless of the type of employed households, is identified by income from basic employment, which does not allow per capita income to be brought to the level of standards that form middle and higher material security (3.1 of subsistence minimum and higher).

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Indicators Of Precarious Employment In The Formal Economy In Russia, Quantitative Evaluation

Cited by 2 publications

References 3 publications

Impact of Employment De-Standardisation on its Quality: Reflections on Academic Discussion at the VI St. Petersburg International Labour Forum

Impact of Employment De-Standardisation on its Quality: Reflections on Academic Discussion at the VI St. Petersburg International Labour Forum

Significant Indicators of Precarious Employment and Their Priority

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About