Abstract:Models of ecosystem change that incorporate nonlinear dynamics and thresholds, such as state-and-transition models (STMs), are increasingly popular tools for land management decision-making. However, few models are based on systematic collection and documentation of ecological data, and of these, most rely solely on structural indicators (species composition) to identify states and transitions. As STMs are adopted as an assessment framework throughout the United States, finding effective and efficient ways to … Show more
“…Millions of hectares of diverse sagebrush steppe in the western USA remain at risk to displacement by woodland encroachment (Suring et al ., ), and researchers, government agencies, and land managers are actively seeking identification of early warning signs for threshold exceedance and restoration pathways to reverse woodland encroachment resilience and trajectories (Scheffer et al ., ; Suding et al ., ; Briske et al ., , , ; McIver et al ., ). Early warning signs of ecohydrologic thresholds for resource‐degrading sagebrush‐to‐woodland conversions likely vary substantially across the diverse domain in which pinyon and juniper species have encroached (Davenport et al ., ; Miller et al ., , ; Romme et al ., ) and are not well established (although see Pyke et al ., ; Kachergis et al ., ; Sheley et al ., ). Restoration pathways are trajectories toward re‐establishment of pre‐threshold states triggered by disturbance or management actions and are assessed through indicators of re‐emerging structure–functional attributes of the pre‐threshold state (Briske et al ., ).…”
Woody plant encroachment on water-limited lands can induce a shift from biotic (plant)-controlled resource retention to abiotic (physical)-driven losses of critical soil resources. The biotic-to-abiotic shift occurs where encroachment propagates connectivity of runoff processes and amplified cross-scale erosion that, in-turn, promote ecohydrologic resilience of the post-encroachment community. We investigated these relationships for woodland-encroached sagebrush steppe in the Great Basin, USA, and evaluated wildfire as a mechanism to reverse the post-encroachment soil erosion feedback. We measured vegetation, soil properties, and runoff/ erosion from experimental plots on burned and unburned areas of a late-succession woodland 1 and 2 years post-fire. Our findings suggest that the biotic-to-abiotic shift and amplified cross-scale erosion occur where encroachment-induced bare ground exceeds 50-60% and bare gaps between plant bases frequently extend beyond 1 m. The trigger for amplified cross-scale erosion is formation of concentrated flow within the degraded intercanopy between trees. Burning in this study decreased ecohydrologic resilience of the latesuccession woodland through herbaceous recruitment 2 years post-fire. Increased intercanopy herbaceous productivity decreased connectivity of bare ground, improved infiltration, and reduced erosion, but the study site remained vulnerable to runoff and erosion from high-intensity rainfall. We conclude that burning can reduce woodland ecohydrologic resilience and that woodland encroachment-induced structural and functional ecohydrologic attributes may persist during high-intensity storms for an undetermined period post-fire. We cannot conclude whether wildfire reverses the woodland-induced soil erosion feedback on sagebrush rangelands. However, our results suggest that wildfire may provide a restoration pathway for sagebrush steppe by reducing woodland ecohydrologic resilience over time. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
“…Millions of hectares of diverse sagebrush steppe in the western USA remain at risk to displacement by woodland encroachment (Suring et al ., ), and researchers, government agencies, and land managers are actively seeking identification of early warning signs for threshold exceedance and restoration pathways to reverse woodland encroachment resilience and trajectories (Scheffer et al ., ; Suding et al ., ; Briske et al ., , , ; McIver et al ., ). Early warning signs of ecohydrologic thresholds for resource‐degrading sagebrush‐to‐woodland conversions likely vary substantially across the diverse domain in which pinyon and juniper species have encroached (Davenport et al ., ; Miller et al ., , ; Romme et al ., ) and are not well established (although see Pyke et al ., ; Kachergis et al ., ; Sheley et al ., ). Restoration pathways are trajectories toward re‐establishment of pre‐threshold states triggered by disturbance or management actions and are assessed through indicators of re‐emerging structure–functional attributes of the pre‐threshold state (Briske et al ., ).…”
Woody plant encroachment on water-limited lands can induce a shift from biotic (plant)-controlled resource retention to abiotic (physical)-driven losses of critical soil resources. The biotic-to-abiotic shift occurs where encroachment propagates connectivity of runoff processes and amplified cross-scale erosion that, in-turn, promote ecohydrologic resilience of the post-encroachment community. We investigated these relationships for woodland-encroached sagebrush steppe in the Great Basin, USA, and evaluated wildfire as a mechanism to reverse the post-encroachment soil erosion feedback. We measured vegetation, soil properties, and runoff/ erosion from experimental plots on burned and unburned areas of a late-succession woodland 1 and 2 years post-fire. Our findings suggest that the biotic-to-abiotic shift and amplified cross-scale erosion occur where encroachment-induced bare ground exceeds 50-60% and bare gaps between plant bases frequently extend beyond 1 m. The trigger for amplified cross-scale erosion is formation of concentrated flow within the degraded intercanopy between trees. Burning in this study decreased ecohydrologic resilience of the latesuccession woodland through herbaceous recruitment 2 years post-fire. Increased intercanopy herbaceous productivity decreased connectivity of bare ground, improved infiltration, and reduced erosion, but the study site remained vulnerable to runoff and erosion from high-intensity rainfall. We conclude that burning can reduce woodland ecohydrologic resilience and that woodland encroachment-induced structural and functional ecohydrologic attributes may persist during high-intensity storms for an undetermined period post-fire. We cannot conclude whether wildfire reverses the woodland-induced soil erosion feedback on sagebrush rangelands. However, our results suggest that wildfire may provide a restoration pathway for sagebrush steppe by reducing woodland ecohydrologic resilience over time. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
“…Detailed methods are reported in Kachergis et al. (), but they are summarized here. We sampled seventy‐six 20 × 50 m plots for vegetation in 2007 and 2008 and for soils in 2009.…”
Question: Is valuable information lost when plant trait group composition is used, rather than species composition, to describe plant community response to range management?Location: Elkhead Watershed, Colorado, US.Methods: Current model-building efforts use species composition to define changes in ecosystem state, but plant traits may offer a faster and more broadly applicable alternative. We (1) compare states defined by species composition to those defined by trait-based groups of differing complexity and (2) determine how management and environmental site characteristics relate to species-and trait group-defined states. We sampled 72 plots with different grazing and chemical shrub treatment histories on two soil types. We measured plant species composition in each plot and categorized species into trait groups using three classification schemes, which represented increasing numbers of traits and levels of classification complexity. The classifications employed easily measured traits that affect plant response to range management: life form, life history, resprouting ability, height, vegetative reproduction and N-fixation. Using hierarchical cluster analysis, we identified states with similar species or trait group composition. We explored relationships between each set of potential states and management history and environmental factors using logistic regression.Results: Trait-based group composition and species composition identified many of the same potential states and responses to grazing and chemical shrub treatment. Relationships between species and trait group composition and management and environmental characteristics differed on the two soil types. Species composition was sensitive to more different management practices, on average, than trait group composition. Trait group composition revealed some relationships to management and environmental drivers that were not detected using species composition.Conclusion: This study confirms that species composition is a more sensitive indicator of sagebrush steppe response to range management, and some information is lost with a trait-based approach. However, traits also add to depth of understanding by revealing additional community patterns related to different drivers. Using the most complex trait grouping scheme that is feasible in a particular study, and also looking for patterns based on simpler trait groups, will provide the most complete understanding of sagebrush steppe response to range management.
“…Descriptions of alternative states tend to focus on the relationships of vegetation structure to the processes maintaining that structure, such as erosion, fire frequency, or nitrogen fixation (Petersen et al 2009;Kachergis et al 2011). Some STMs depict both alternative states and transient dynamics within states by using boxes for plant communities and separating certain communities using irreversible transitions across a threshold boundary, signifying a state transition (Oliva et al 1998).…”
State and transition models (STMs) are used to organize and communicate information regarding ecosystem change, especially the implications for management. The fundamental premise that rangelands can exhibit multiple states is now widely accepted and has deeply pervaded management thinking, even in the absence of formal STM development. The current application of STMs for management, however, has been limited by both the science and the ability of institutions to develop and use STMs. In this chapter, we provide a comprehensive and contemporary overview of STM concepts and applications at a global level. We first review the ecological concepts underlying STMs with the goal of bridging STMs to recent theoretical developments in ecology. We then provide a synthesis of the history of
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.