2009
DOI: 10.1080/01904160903006044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indicators of Cotton Nitrogen Status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
15
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Bronson et al (2001) reported that SPAD readings were less variable than petiole NO 3 meter readings for assessing N status in cotton at blooming. However, Wiedenfeld et al (2009) found petiole sap readings to be more closely related to N rate than leaf N or SPAD measurements. On the other hand, factors such as crop age, plant species, leaf-soil water status, time of measurement and irradiance level can affect how well SPAD readings do in distinguishing exhibiting N treatment effects (Wood et al, 1992;Bronson et al, 2001;Wiedenfeld et al, 2009;Martinez and Guiamet, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bronson et al (2001) reported that SPAD readings were less variable than petiole NO 3 meter readings for assessing N status in cotton at blooming. However, Wiedenfeld et al (2009) found petiole sap readings to be more closely related to N rate than leaf N or SPAD measurements. On the other hand, factors such as crop age, plant species, leaf-soil water status, time of measurement and irradiance level can affect how well SPAD readings do in distinguishing exhibiting N treatment effects (Wood et al, 1992;Bronson et al, 2001;Wiedenfeld et al, 2009;Martinez and Guiamet, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, Wiedenfeld et al (2009) found petiole sap readings to be more closely related to N rate than leaf N or SPAD measurements. On the other hand, factors such as crop age, plant species, leaf-soil water status, time of measurement and irradiance level can affect how well SPAD readings do in distinguishing exhibiting N treatment effects (Wood et al, 1992;Bronson et al, 2001;Wiedenfeld et al, 2009;Martinez and Guiamet, 2004). Bronson et al (2003) reported that both leaf N and SPAD readings could be used to guide N fertilization rates as early as at squaring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Artan oranlarda azot kullanımının açık koza sayısını azalttığı başka araştırmacılar tarafından vurgulanmıştır (Şahin ve ark. 1994;Wiedenfeld et al 2009). Bazı araştırıcılar ise artan N dozlarının açık koza sayısını etkilemediğini belirtmişlerdir (Şahin ve Hüyük 1991;Karademir ve ark.…”
Section: Bulgular Ve Tartışmaunclassified
“…At blooming, Bronson et al [11] found that while chlorophyll meter readings were superior to petiole NO3 meter readings for assessing N status in cotton. On the other hand, Wiedenfeld et al [12] reported that petiole sap readings were more closely related to N rate than leaf N or chlorophyll meter measurements. Rosolem and Van Meliss [13] and Malavolta et al [14] found that the efficiency of a chlorophyll meter in distinguishing N contents was viable well into flowering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%