Indicators for collection evaluation: a new dimensional framework

Abstract

PurposeCurrently there is a need for an updated assessment model that addresses and reflects the ongoing diversity of issues related to collection evaluation in academic libraries. The purpose of this paper is to provide conceptual guidelines and a model to support collection evaluation and assessment in this time of unstable and constantly changing patterns of information.Design/methodology/approachThe paper provides a literature review of the collection evaluation and assessment. Based on an analytical study of environmental factors and their relationship to, and impact on, the library collection, the authors propose a new model of collection evaluation to address the needs of the current environment.FindingsThe paper identifies environmental factors in collection evaluation, establishes a set of ratios that need to be addressed and finally, provides a set of indicators for collection evaluation and assessment that can be selected from, and adapted to each library's needs.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper bridges two different collection evaluation models, collection‐based and user‐based. It identifies that there is not a single appropriate collection evaluation method. It provides a different perspective to a body of literature that is mostly best practice‐based.Practical implicationsWith this research a new model is suggested that provides flexibility and adaptability. It offers a multidimensional approach that libraries can use and adapt to their specific situation.Originality/valueThe new model suggested here addresses a current need generated by a changing information environment. It adds a new approach to the body of literature in the area of collection evaluation.

Collection Development Guidance through Reference Inquiry Analysis: A Study of Map Library Patrons and Their Needs

“…Many emphasize new models for collection evaluation based on these various user indicators including circulation statistics and interlibrary loan statistics, as well as breakdowns by subject (Agee 2005;Borin and Yi 2008;Dobson, Kushkowski, and Gerhard 1996;Knievel, Wicht, and Connaway 2006). Analyzing map library reference requests is but one example of unobtrusively observing user needs.…”

How to Drink From a Fire Hose Without Drowning: Collection Assessment in a Numbers-Driven Environment

“…In a collection evaluation article from 1979, Mosher states, "quantification is currently in high fashion in the social sciences, and librarianship, calling itself "library science," sometimes identifies closely with this development of the larger group of disciplines of which many librarians feel themselves a part" (Mosher, 1979, 21). Borin and Yi's (2008) article looks at both usage-based criteria and standards metrics. Their approach "allows libraries to balance and adjust the ratios between their collections to support strategic planning of library collections and services.…”

How to evaluate library collections: a case study of collection mapping

“…In the current reality it is important to watch the ratios and relationships between print and electronic collections to predict future trends and to ensure that print and electronic collections complement one another in support of library and organizational goals (Borin and Yi, 2008).…”

“…However, it is very useful to combine old and new collection evaluation models by adopting "the best of the older criteria based evaluation methods for print resources combined with the newer usage based statistics for electronic resources" (Borin and Yi, 2008). The collection mapping technique used in the Finnish Collection Map Consortium involves features from both collection-centered and user-centered methods.…”