1985
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1985.tb01183.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indicator organisms for estuarine and marine waters

Abstract: The use of indicator organisms for estuarine and coastal waters has been reviewed. The natural flora of the environment must be considered in selecting an indicator organism, but, more importantly, recent work which shows a viable but non‐recoverable stage of pathogens entering the marine environment demonstrates that the conventional detection of indicator microorganisms is misleading, if not inaccurate. Results suggest that the newly developed epifluorescent/immunofluorescent direct detection of pathogens in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 146 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of correlation between bacterial indicator levels and levels of human-pathogenic viruses has been observed in previous studies (8,9) and demonstrates the value of the multitiered approach used here for source identification. For example, analysis of wild shellfish from the Atlantic coast of France indicated no significant correlation between fecal coliforms and enteroviruses or hepatitis A virus (26,27), and viruses have sometimes been found in oysters without coliform contamination (15,45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The lack of correlation between bacterial indicator levels and levels of human-pathogenic viruses has been observed in previous studies (8,9) and demonstrates the value of the multitiered approach used here for source identification. For example, analysis of wild shellfish from the Atlantic coast of France indicated no significant correlation between fecal coliforms and enteroviruses or hepatitis A virus (26,27), and viruses have sometimes been found in oysters without coliform contamination (15,45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Consequently, considerable interest has been shown in the fate of enteric bacteria in natural and drinking waters (McFeters & Stuart, 1972 ;Davenport et al 1976 ;Xu et al, 1982 ;Elliot & Colwell, 1985 ;Grimes et al ., 1986 ;Rhodes & Kator, 1988 ;Gonzalez et al, 1992) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fate of enteric bacteria in natural waters is affected by factors such as light (Fujioka et al, 1981 ;Elliot & Colwell, 1985 ; Barcina et al ., 1986Barcina et al ., , 1989Barcina et al ., , 1991, protistan predation (Enzinger &Cooper, 1976 ;McCambridge & McMeekin, 1979, 1980Anderson et al, 1983 ;Mallory et al, 1983 ;Rhodes & Kator, 1988; Barcina et al, 1989Barcina et al, , 1991Gonzalez et al ., 1992), temperature (Verstraete & Voets, 1976 ;McCambridge & McMeekin, 1979 ;Anderson et al, 1983 ;Gameson, 1984 ;Barcina et al, 1986Barcina et al, , 1991 and other physical and chemical parameters (Davenport et al, 1976 ;Dawe & Penrose, 1978 ;Xu et al, 1982 ;Anderson et al, 1983 ;Elliot & Colwell, 1985 ;Grimes et al, 1986 ;Gonzalez et al, 1992) . Due to these factors, the number of enteric bacteria in natural waters decreases over time .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that the indicator will have the same source specificity as pathogens, be easy to detect, and exhibit similar but superior survival characteristics (Elliot & Colwell 1985). Many microorganisms have been suggested as potential indicators and the topic has been reviewed by several authors, including Cabelli (1978) and Stanfield (1985).…”
Section: Faecal Streptococci As Indicators In Recreational Watersmentioning
confidence: 99%