2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2011.01695.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indications for substrate preferences in juvenile hatchery-reared great sturgeon, Huso huso

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, some other species do not always prefer structural enrichment. Beluga sturgeon Huso huso (Acipeseridae) juveniles generally prefer smooth bottoms, for example, concrete, over gravel (Falahatkar and Shakoorian ). This may be an effect of an overall preference for plain sandy substrates, a bottom type which was not present in the study, but shown to be strongly preferred by another sturgeon species (Peake ).…”
Section: Preferences: What Do the Fishes Actually Want?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, some other species do not always prefer structural enrichment. Beluga sturgeon Huso huso (Acipeseridae) juveniles generally prefer smooth bottoms, for example, concrete, over gravel (Falahatkar and Shakoorian ). This may be an effect of an overall preference for plain sandy substrates, a bottom type which was not present in the study, but shown to be strongly preferred by another sturgeon species (Peake ).…”
Section: Preferences: What Do the Fishes Actually Want?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nguyen and Crocker (2006) found larvae of white sturgeon distributed among substrates, which included clean gravel and cobble. Falahatkar and Shakoorian (2011) confirmed that juvenile great sturgeon mostly prefer a flat, concrete bottom versus other substrate types in an aquaculture environment. Chai, Huang, Zhu, Yang, and Wu (2019) found that larvae of Schizothorax wangchiachii have different substrate preferences at different growth stages.…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In the present study, the endless channel prevented the end effect (Falahatkar & Shakoorian, ) and allowed fish to swim upstream or downstream without encountering a wall and being forced to turn around. Schools of juveniles swam upstream and downstream in the channel, and the benefit of using an endless channel with no “end effect” was most evident when fish schools swam several loops around the channel in one direction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%